Sorry I couldn't be of more help. I guess as you say, it's only the people who've had to cross this bridge, that'll really have anything to add to make you feel any better over it. Have you posted in the Citrix forums, too? Cheers Neil > -----Original Message----- > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of BRUTON, Malcolm, FM > Sent: 20 January 2006 10:38 > To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' > Subject: [THIN] Re: XML Request size repost > > AD users with nested groups already. However we have a large > number of legacy SID History groups which is why it is so > large. You are right. > Citrix just shrug and say test it. We have but that is > different than releasing it into production on a live system. > > Hoping someone else had come across this issue before and > could give indication what safe figures were or what issues > they faced. > > Thanks Neil > > Malcolm > > -----Original Message----- > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Braebaum, Neil > Sent: 20 January 2006 10:14 > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [THIN] Re: XML Request size repost > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of BRUTON, Malcolm, FM > > Sent: 20 January 2006 10:06 > > To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' > > Subject: [THIN] XML Request size repost > > > > Got the following error when trying to use WI3 with XPe FR3 (+ > > hotfixes) and Single Sign on turned on > > > > "Error: The MetaFrame server farm cannot process your > request at this > > time. > > Error: Citrix XML Service request too large, more than 4096 > bytes [413 > > request too large]." > > > > Implementing the fix in point 2 from article > > > > http://support.citrix.com/article/entry.jspa?entryID=2205 > > <http://support.citrix.com/article/entry.jspa?entryID=2205> > > > > Fixes it. > > However we have to increase this from 4096 to approx 80,000 to get > > this to work for a user who is a member of approx 500 groups. > > Are these AD users? > > And / or could you truncate the number of group memberships > by using nested groups? > > > Seem a bit excessive to have to take this form 4 k to 80k > to get it to > > work. > > I'm guessing they expect direct group memberships to be > modest. To be equitable, having many group memberships is not ideal. > > > My understanding is we need approx > > 32 bytes per group. We have an average of 250 group > memberships per > > user with the max at 800. Any ideas if the XML service is stable at > > say 100K or will not cause issues? > > <shrug> I'd be surprised if Citrix or anybody else give you a > firm steer, unless they've confirmed such a thing themselves. > > > What is impact on servers doing XML requests or network traffic. > > Should we set on all servers or only servers handling XML requests? > > Just those running the XML service. > > Neil ***************************************************************************** This email and its attachments are confidential and are intended for the above named recipient only. If this has come to you in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system. You must take no action based on this, nor must you copy or disclose it or any part of its contents to any person or organisation. Statements and opinions contained in this email may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods Shop Direct Group Limited or its subsidiaries. Please note that email communications may be monitored. The registered office of Littlewoods Shop Direct Group Limited is 100 Old Hall Street Liverpool L70 1AB registered number 5059352 ***************************************************************************** This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl - www.blackspider.com ************************************************ For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: //www.freelists.org/list/thin ************************************************