There really isn't much of a comparison. Sure microsoft has added sound = and higher colour depth to RDP but TS still lacks in many areas: No published apps No real load-balancing (by application). In the microsoft world, all = apps would have to be on NLB servers. With Citrix, farms can be split = up according to apps. (No need for the piggish app to slow down another = user's Word session) No real security, Microsoft VPN is a joke. Citrix can provide SSL = Encrypted sessions. No CSG No Web based Portal such as NFuse Classic or Secure Access Manager No network monitoring, resource monitoring, application Package (that is = native to W2k3) No management console to manage the Farm. -----Original Message----- From: Rick Lite [mailto:rick.lite@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 9:19 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Win 2003 I have a client who is running WinNT Server and is convinced he should = move to Citrix for his mfg. plant. I understand that Windows Server 2003 has beefed up it's Terminal Services to match the features of Citrix. Does anyone have any insight into this comparison? Thanks, Rick ******************************************************** This Week's Sponsor - ThinPrint Simply the best print solution for Microsoft Terminal Services=20 and Citrix Metaframe. http://www.thinprint.com/ ********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or=20 set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm ******************************************************** This Week's Sponsor - ThinPrint Simply the best print solution for Microsoft Terminal Services and Citrix Metaframe. http://www.thinprint.com/ ********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm