[THIN] Re: VMWare ESX Server
- From: "Chris Fraser" <chrisfraser@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:46:42 -0800
Hi there Brian
I would disagree that virtual anything can never be as good as the real
thing. In fact I think VMware ESX-based anything can be quite a bit better
than the real thing _BUT_ you need to have a good understanding of your
workload and usage patterns (sound familiar anyone?).
Hardware-cost and form-factor are trivial expenses compared to the overall
TCO or $$$ impact of downtime.
I've seen scenarios where the vendor, with a minimum of troubleshooting or
problem isolation, pointed the finger at VMware. After further investigation
we were able to determine that the issue was actually the application or the
OS and it was only exposed or magnified by running on VMware.
VMware will not give you something for nothing. It is absolutely key that
you understand what you have and where you need to get to and then plan and
build it accordingly.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of RMC - Brian Hill
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 10:24 AM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Re: VMWare ESX Server
I've never been a fan of VMs in the production environment. I have used
them for development a few times, but even then, I prefer a "real world"
scenario for development as well. I've had DC's that were flaky, with the
only variable being VMWare. Dunno, maybe it's just me. Hardware cost are
relatively cheap these days, the form-factor is small, so I don't think VMs
buy you a whole lot. They have their place I suppose, but they are not
something I pursue. Virtual "anything" can never be as good as the real
thing IMO.
Brian
-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Hooper [mailto:jennifer.hooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 12:23 PM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] VMWare ESX Server
Hi Guys -
Here's the situation. We are about 1/4th of the way through converting
our production data center (full of old, out of warranty Compaq servers) to
IBM BladeCenters running VMWare ESX Server 2.0 (I think... whatever the
latest version is). We use Platespin to convert the physical server to the
VMWare image and move it over to the Blade it's going to live on. Right
now, we have an average 5 servers per blade planned, and several have
already moved over, because the hardware failed that they were on. However,
some of the application folks are uncomfortable with this solution, not so
much the Blade technology, as the VM technology. Needless to say, we're
already experiencing failures, and stuff not running right - performance
issues, network issues, etc. (Can you believe that they are going to run
our Root Domain Controllers on this?) I have already experienced a drag on
one of my Citrix servers that moved to virtual space, and can't fix it up.
So what I would like to do before things get too much more hairy, is to
try to find out what the success rate of running something like this in
production, and if there are a lot of people out there doing this. Feel
free to share with me any nightmare stories too! :)
Thanks much!
Jen
Jennifer Hooper
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
Sr. Network Engineer
mailto:jennifer.hooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
