[THIN] Re: Softricity vs Tarpon
- From: "Jeff Pitsch" <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:54:00 -0400
Your missing the big picture here. It's not nearly as black and white as the OP thinks it is. The future is going to become very very interesting with both MS and Citrix.
*Jeff Pitsch Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server*
*Forums not enough? Get support from the experts at your business **http://jeffpitschconsulting.com* <http://jeffpitschconsulting.com/>
On 7/19/06, Chris Grecsek <cgrecsek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
…seems like they kind of are in some respects…with all of the hardware acquisitions.
*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Joe Shonk *Sent:* Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:59 AM *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Softricity vs Tarpon
Given that line of thought, Citrix should give up on Presentation Server given Terminal Server is built into the kernel.
On 7/19/06, *Chris Grecsek* < cgrecsek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Seems to me that Citrix should pretty much give up on their virtualization technology given that M$ just bought Softricity and all signs point to M$ adding it to their core OS stack…any thoughts?