[THIN] Re: Shadowing Issue

  • From: "Rick Mack" <Rick.Mack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 07:20:06 +1000

Hi John,
 
Have a look at iShadow (www.tekworkshop.com). 
 
Aside from everything else it can do it should have the granularity you
need.
 
regards,
 
Rick

Ulrich Mack
Volante Systems Ltd
18 Heussler Terrace, Milton 4064
Queensland Australia.
Ph: +61 7 3246 7704
email: rmack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
web: www.volante.com.au




        -----Original Message-----
        From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Hardwick
        Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2004 3:22 AM
        To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [THIN] Re: Shadowing Issue
        
        

        Thanks for the reply Rick.  My only issue with QuickShadow or
even perhaps the Shadow toolbar (haven't tested it yet) is that I need
the user to only be able to shadow a select group of users?  Does anyone
know what scope the policies that are setup in Citrix apply to?  I.e.
will QuickShadow only allow shadowing of the restricted set of users?

         

        John Hardwick

        President

        nXio, LLC.

        913-754-8120 x125

        www.nxio.net

        
________________________________


        From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rick Mack
        Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 6:43 AM
        To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [THIN] Re: Shadowing Issue

         

        Hi John,

         

        Sounds like you've done all the right things.

         

        Don't know whether I'd spend a lot more time with mfadmin. 

         

        Try the shadow toolbar or quikshadow (downloadable from
www.thethin.net) first. 

         

        If they work, then the issue is with mfadmin rather than a
shadowing rights or policies issue.

         

        As an example, I use a script with cshadow.exe to do many to one
user shadowing (for remote group training) with almost exactly the same
setup as you.

         

        regards,

         

        Rick

        Ulrich Mack
        Volante Systems Ltd
        18 Heussler Terrace, Milton 4064
        Queensland Australia.
        Ph: +61 7 3246 7704
        email: rmack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        web: www.volante.com.au
        
        

                -----Original Message-----
                From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Hardwick
                Sent: Wednesday, 6 October 2004 8:50 AM
                To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
                Subject: [THIN] Shadowing Issue

                I have a MF 3.0 Server with all of the latest hot fixes
installed.  It is running on 2003 standard server.

                 

                The problem I am having is that I have several
non-administrative users that need shadowing rights and I'm not sure
what I'm missing as I've set this up time after time on other server
farms without a problem.

                 

                I have a Citrix policy that is applied to the group of
users to be shadowed.  It is configured as Configuration enabled, Allow
Shadowing, Prohibit Shadowing without notification and the permissions
are set as enabled and the group of users that need to do the shadowing
is added below.

                 

                If I do a resultant set of policy in group policy it is
configured as follows:

                 

                Computer / Administrative / Windows Components /
Terminal Services

                *       Allow users to connect remotely - enabled 
                *       Automatic reconnection - enabled 
                *       Keep-alive connections - enabled - interval 1 
                *       Restrict to single session - disabled 
                *       Sets rules - enabled - Full control with user's
permission 

                 

                Computer / Administrative / Windows Components /
Terminal Services/Sessions

                *       Allow reconnection from original client only -
disabled 

                 

                So I thought that perhaps it was security settings or
something on the individual servers... so I took the group that contains
all of the users that should have the full rights to shadow as defined
in the Citrix policy as well and configured them manually on each of the
terminal server's ICA connections to be "Special" which is the
combination of full, user access and guest access along with logoff I
believe it was (basically everything under the advanced options.)

                 

                The users are able to logon now and go into MF Admin,
right click on a user and the only options that they get are:

                 

                Disconnect

                Send Message

                Reset

                Status 

                Logoff  

                 

                And if they happen to be running MF Admin from the same
server as the user they are allowed the connect option.  (See problem #2
below.)

                 

                I'm not sure what I'm missing... ideally this select
group of people need to be able to shadow a set group of users no matter
what server they are on, be able to connect to their disconnects, etc as
well.  I'm just out of permission places to look that I can think of.  

                 

                PS... as a regular administrator (outside of the group
above) I am able to shadow any user on any server.

                 

                Problem #2...

                 

                As the domain admin and any of my admin accounts for
that matter... I am only able to connect to connections that are on the
same TS as MF Admin is running from and then MF Admin will not allow me
to do anything to a disconnected session other than reset it or log it
off.   I would like to be able to connect to them.

                 

                This is a new server farm so this is all probably based
on something that I missed somewhere in the config.

                 

                Problem #3... perhaps related...

                 

                I have some users who will be disconnected from a
session and the server shows the session as disconnected, but when they
attempt to reconnect they are told they already have an instance of the
application running and it won't reconnect the session.

                 

                Sessions are set to allow reconnect from any device, so
again no clue as to why its not working.

                 

                Thanks in advance for any help or direction that anyone
can provide.

                 

                 

                John Hardwick

                President

                nXio, LLC.

                913-754-8120 x125

                www.nxio.net

                 

        
________________________________


        This e-mail, including all attachments, may be confidential or
privileged.  Confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost because
this e-mail has been sent to you in error.  If you are not the intended
recipient any use, disclosure or copying of this e-mail is prohibited.
If you have received it in error please notify the sender immediately by
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this e-mail and any attachments.
All liability for direct and indirect loss arising from this e-mail and
any attachments is hereby disclaimed to the extent permitted by law.

        
________________________________



#####################################################################################
This e-mail, including all attachments, may be confidential or privileged.  
Confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost because this e-mail has been 
sent to you in error.  If you are not the intended recipient any use, 
disclosure or copying of this e-mail is prohibited.  If you have received it in 
error please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of this e-mail and any attachments.  All liability for direct and 
indirect loss arising from this e-mail and any attachments is hereby disclaimed 
to the extent permitted by law.
#####################################################################################

Other related posts: