I assume this product is thin-client based only? From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel Sidler Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 9:32 AM To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: [THIN] Re: RTO Software Sensitivity: Private If you are like me and you have always felt that this should actually be solved by MS and/or Citrix, look no further. Citrix will announce the aquisition of sepagoPROFILE at Synergy in Houston. Regards, Dan ________________________________ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Greenberg Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 6:34 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: RTO Software It appears to address the specific problem that large profiles, and/or profiles with many files in them, leading to long login times. It is probably fair to say that it does not address the architectural issues with profiles themselves. In my experience there are plenty of organizations in which long login times are a real productivity/satification/cost factor and I think it is great that there is a solution that can directly address that. I think it is cool.... Steve Greenberg Thin Client Computing 34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453 Scottsdale, AZ 85266 (602) 432-8649 www.thinclient.net steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ________________________________ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Beckett, William (Bill) Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 5:29 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] RTO Software Is anyone out there using the virtual profiles software? It seems that the main benefit is logon time, which of course is critical but am I missing anything as far as other benefits/problems solved? Not knocking at all, it's a great idea....in fact is a TS environment the only place it can be used or can it be implemented for roaming profiles on a fat client?