[THIN] Re: Perfmon
- From: Michel Roth <mrdizzz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 08:06:51 +0100
Also take in account that any nework related problems could impact your
reading if you measure via the network.
Kind Regards,
Michel Roth
www.thincomputing.net <http://www.thincomputing.net>
2005/11/2, Tim Mangan <tmangan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> The results would be the same. Best practice, however, is to run perfmon
> on a different machine and pull counters from the server you are interested
> in remotely (When you click on the "plus" to add a counter you can select
> what server to pull counters from). The GUI and/or logging parts of perfmon
> add significant load to the server whereas pulling of counters is cheap.
>
> tim
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Bill Beckett
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 02, 2005 9:59 AM
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Perfmon
>
> If you run perfmon from a terminal server session, are you getting an
> accurate read from physical disk and CPU or does it have to be run from the
> console?
>
Other related posts:
