[THIN] Re: OT: VMWare ESX 3.x Internal / DMZ networks on same physical server

From: "Michael Pardee" <pardeemp.list@xxxxxxxxx>
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:09:56 -0500

Very good point Steve, all of our VMWare servers are quad dual-core boxes
with 32GB of memory, so we are seeing much better performance than we used
to.  I think everyone has made some very good points here.  Reason 4,663
that this list rocks.

On 2/23/07, Bob Coffman Jr - Info From Data <bcoffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


 Poignant?  You should have just said subtle!  :)



 -----Original Message-----
*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *Braebaum, Neil
*Sent:* Friday, February 23, 2007 10:14 AM
*To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [THIN] Re: OT: VMWare ESX 3.x Internal / DMZ networks on same
physical server

Just to point out the subtle, yet poignant, difference between throughput
and latency...

Neil



--

Michael Pardee
www.blindsquirrel.org

Follow-Ups:

[THIN] Re: OT: VMWare ESX 3.x Internal / DMZ networks on same physical server
From: Steve Greenberg

References:
- [THIN] Re: OT: VMWare ESX 3.x Internal / DMZ networks on same physical server
  - From: Braebaum, Neil
- [THIN] Re: OT: VMWare ESX 3.x Internal / DMZ networks on same physical server
  - From: Bob Coffman Jr - Info From Data

[THIN] Re: OT: VMWare ESX 3.x Internal / DMZ networks on same physical server

Other related posts: