[THIN] Re: OT: VMWare ESX 3.x Internal / DMZ networks on same physical server

*       our VMWare servers are quad dual-core boxes with 32GB of memory

 

That is great, I can actually remember where 32MB of RAM was an option :-)

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85262

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

  _____  

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Michael Pardee
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 12:10 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: VMWare ESX 3.x Internal / DMZ networks on same
physical server

 

Very good point Steve, all of our VMWare servers are quad dual-core boxes
with 32GB of memory, so we are seeing much better performance than we used
to.  I think everyone has made some very good points here.  Reason 4,663
that this list rocks. 

On 2/23/07, Bob Coffman Jr - Info From Data <bcoffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Poignant?  You should have just said subtle!  :)

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: <mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Braebaum, Neil
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 10:14 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: OT: VMWare ESX 3.x Internal / DMZ networks on same
physical server

Just to point out the subtle, yet poignant, difference between throughput
and latency...

 

Neil




-- 

Michael Pardee
www.blindsquirrel.org

Other related posts: