Using other vendor products I can tell you that a 5400 IDE on a blade is pretty slow. I am currently using the new IBM blades with SCSI on a project and there is no perceiveable difference between them and a standard server using SCSI..... Steve Greenberg Thin Client Computing 34522 N. Scottsdale Rd. suite D8453 Scottsdale, AZ 85262 (602) 432-8649 (602) 296-0411 fax steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx _____ From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roger Riggins Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 9:01 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: IBM Blade Performance using IDE 5400 rpm drives. Don't use 5400 rpm drives. It probably isn't a bottleneck, but it will feel less snappy. I'd imagine the access and seeks times on that drive will be blown away by a 15k scsi. R -----Original Message----- From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Glenn Dona Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 9:49 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] IBM Blade Performance using IDE 5400 rpm drives. Hello, Has any body used the IBM Blades with 5400 RPM? Will this cause the bottle neck if we use it? Should we upgrade the blades to the new IBM SCSI drives before we commit ourselves in deploying Citrix. Any Replies is much appreciated. Glenn J.C. Dona IT PC/Network Manager 1809 Walnut St. Philadelphia, PA 19103 Voice- 215-972-4290 Fax- 215-972-4292 www.urbn.com www.anthropologie.com www.freepeople.com DISCLAIMER: This message contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). Any use, disclosure or copying of this message or any part thereof by any person other than such addressee(s) is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the message. Thank you for your cooperation.