[THIN] Re: Fw: Re: SSL
- From: "Carl Stalhood" <cstalhood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:44:44 -0600
Runs on 2003 Standard Edition, not SBS. Same as PS 4 Standard Edition with CSG
but:
1. 75 named users max
2. Named user licensing (instead of concurrent), buy 5 users at a time
3. Includes TS CALs
4. Includes CPU and Memory control (normally Enterprise only features)
5. Cannot be upgraded to other PS 4 editions
6. No load balancing
7. Easy to install. Install default 2003 and it installs the rest
(including TS, TS Licensing, IIS, etc.)
8. Includes easy configuration tool for published apps (it sees all
shortcuts in Start Menu, place check mark next
to the ones you want to publish and it does the rest)
9. Includes easy configuration tool for CSG (simply install cert and it
does the rest)
Designed to run all Citrix components on one server.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Kaftan, John
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 3:25 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Fw: Re: SSL
This is interesting. Does anyone know how it works? I read the blurb but it
did not say. How is Access Essentials
different from CSG and full blown Presentation Server? My guess is that it
runs on Microsoft SBS.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
M
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:59 PM
To: Thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Fw: Re: SSL
Citrix Access Essentials ?
http://www.citrix.com/English/ps2/products/product.asp?contentID=21376
----- Original Message -----
From: Bijumon <mailto:bijumon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Chacko
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 5:06 PM
Subject: [THIN] Re: SSL
Hii
The main idea was to reduce hardware..
It seems, we cant install Pres server, WI and CSG on same box..
----- Original Message -----
From: Kaftan, John <mailto:jkaftan@xxxxxxx>
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 9:30 PM
Subject: [THIN] Re: SSL
I have to ask why would what to do this? CSG is pretty slick. It doesn't cost
anything, and all traffic is encrypted
with minimal exposure to your LAN. Hardware wise you can run it on your WI box
and you don't need much in the way of
resources.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Andrew Wood
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 1:36 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: SSL
Enabling https will secure the traffic to the citrix xml service. Enabling SSL
relay will secure all traffic to the
citrix server
You don't need to setup SSL Relay to enable https for your XML service. Https
for xml needs IIS to be installed and
shared with XML service. Whichever one you use you will need a server
certificate on each of the citrix servers you want
to secure, and the root certificate for your private CA installed on each of
your clients.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Bijumon Chacko
Sent: 29 August 2005 15:53
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] SSL
Hii friends..
Im thinking of setting up SSL (without CSG) using a private CA.
The HTTPS communication workins fine between WI and client.
But i am loosing track on secure connectioin to the MF server.
Should I use HTTPS orCitrix SSL RElay.
Both cases, do i have to setupSSL relay on MFXP configuration
thanx
B
Other related posts:
