Then they would have no problem providing you with providing you a bandwidth utilization reports measured per second, right? ;-) On 1/5/07, Angela Smith <angela_smith9@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Users are on a WAN but our Networks team assure me the Links are not being saturated >From: "Michel Roth" <mrdizzz@xxxxxxxxx> >Reply-To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [THIN] Re: Controlling Virtual Memory Usage >Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:14:32 +0100 > >Angela, > >Are your users located on a LAN or a WAN? > >On 1/4/07, Angela Smith <angela_smith9@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>Evan >> >>I am having the same issues in regards to keystroke delays and >>intermittent >>hanging in sessions. I have enabled Memory optimization to see if that >>makes a difference. Will keep you informed. Failing this I will look at >>Appsense >> >>Ang >> >> >> >From: Evan Mann <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >Reply-To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >Subject: [THIN] Re: Controlling Virtual Memory Usage >> >Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 08:35:03 -0500 >> > >> >Piggy backing onto the virtual memory usage. I have very high virtual >> >memory usage, even though I have 1 to 2 gigs of physical memory free. I >> >also have plenty of idle CPU but I have heavy complaints of a slow user >> >experience, such as Outlook keystrokes not appearing as they are typed. >> > >> >I have plenty of bandwidth (10mbits upstream with only 3mbps used), and >> >the users complaining have plenty of up/down bandwidth available. Could >> >high virtual memory and paging cause this type of performance problems, >> >or would it be unrelated? >> > >> >________________________________ >> > >> >From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >> >Behalf Of Rick Mack >> >Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 6:56 AM >> >To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >Subject: [THIN] Re: Controlling Virtual Memory Usage >> > >> > >> >Hi Angela, >> > >> >Sounds like a Java app :-( >> > >> >Seriously, DLL remapping (memory optimization) probably won't give you a >> >lot of value in your scenario, but it'd be worth trying. Sure there's >> >the risk it will break something but it's dead easy to turn off without >> >rebooting to check. And there's enough tweaking possible to have memory >> >optimization and everything working as well. >> > >> >However a product like Appsense performance manager that also does >> >memory working set trimming of backgrounded and idle processes will >> >probably work much better in your scenario. Try the eval version, or >> >better yet get your reseller to install an eval version and see how it >> >goes. It's not cheap but it's also a lot less expensive than more >> >servers. >> > >> >Considering that paging activity is likely to be the bottleneck >> >regardless of the size of the pagfile(s), I'd suggest you stick with the >> >configuration you've got and try memory optimization and Appsense first. >> >It's possible to have multiple page files on separate partitions or even >> >the same partition but it'd probably make things worse for you rather >> >than better. >> > >> >regards, >> > >> >Rick >> > >> >Ulrich Mack >> >Commander Australia >> > >> > >> >On 1/3/07, Angela Smith <angela_smith9@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > Hi >> > >> > Almost all my Windows 2003 STD / Presentation Server 4 servers >> >are running >> > out of Swap space. Hardware config is: >> > >> > Dual 3.6Ghz >> > 4Gb RAM >> > >> > Swap size is 4095 - 4095 and it resides on the C: Drive. Main >> >process which >> > is using most of the Swap is Internet Explorer. Most of our >> >Published apps >> > are browser based so I have numerous IEXPLORE.EXE processes >> >eating all the >> > swap. Alot of the IEXPLORE.EXE processes use between 150Mb - >> >300Mb of VM. >> > Is there any way I can tweak the memory usage for IE to minimise >> >the amount >> > of Swap being used? >> > >> > We have not enabled memory optimization in Citrix farm >> >properties as I read >> > it breaks certain applications? Is this the case? Will enabling >> >this assist >> > in this issue? >> > >> > I was going to purchase extra servers to lighten the load but >> >most other >> > resource indicators are OK. I would prefer to tweak existing >> >servers if >> > possible. We have between 80 - 100 sessions per server (40 - 50 >> >users per >> > box on average) >> > >> > Any suggestions appreciated >> > >> > Thanks >> > Angela >> > >> > >> > >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Advertisement: Fresh jobs daily. Stop waiting for the newspaper. Search >>now! >>www.seek.com.au >> >> http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Eseek%2Ecom%2Eau&_t=757263760&_r=Hotmail_EndText_Dec06&_m=EXT >> >>SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com >>************************************************ >>For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or >>set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: >>//www.freelists.org/list/thin >>************************************************ >> _________________________________________________________________ Advertisement: Fresh jobs daily. Stop waiting for the newspaper. Search Now! www.seek.com.au http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Eseek%2Ecom%2Eau&_t=757263760&_r=Hotmail_EndText_Dec06&_m=EXT SBC SITES ONLY GOOGLE SEARCH: http://www.F1U.com ************************************************ For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: //www.freelists.org/list/thin ************************************************