[THIN] Re: C: drive access through WI 4.2
- From: "Andrew Wood" <andrew.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:04:16 +0100
Alan,
I'd agree - I can see their thinking, but its blinkered to think that
circumstances where administrators would want to override that.
This 'functionality' appears in v9 - do you need the full v9 functionality?
does it get more reliable if you drop down to 8?
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Hutchinson, Alan
Sent: 05 July 2006 10:12
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: C: drive access through WI 4.2
Andrew,
If you mean 'trusted' or 'untrusted' in the sense of the accomapanying
article by Jeff - then it's untrusted. It's just that its's not consistent
e.g. I logged in this morning through our WI and got my C: drive. Experience
tells me that if I now log out and back in again there is a high probability
that I won't get this drive.
It's really frustrating - I can sort of understand the rationale to say that
WI connection may be 'untrusted' - but surely that's down to us to decide
(and enable). Our homeworkers are currently using 'known' PC's through an
SSL VPN tunnel, all sorts of end-point scans etc. The business has
eventually decided that these would come into the category of 'trusted'.
Regards,
Alan.
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Andrew Wood
Sent: 05 July 2006 09:58
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: C: drive access through WI 4.2
when it fails is your connection trusted or untrusted?
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Hutchinson, Alan
Sent: 04 July 2006 14:19
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] C: drive access through WI 4.2
Have been requested to provide access to the C: for our homeworkers (after
much of a battle). Have enabled the appropriate policies including Citrix
ones and whilst I can see my C: through PN connection to the desktop I'm
having what I can only call inconsistent c: drive mapping through WI. See
the note from Jeff Pitsch
(http://www.brianmadden.com/content/content.asp?ID=504) to confirm. Anyone
with any ideas - I've tried doing a 'manual' mapping at logon but this is
also inconsistent.
W2K3SP1, MPS4, WI4.2
Regards,
Alan.
Other related posts:
