Well, just to make sure that nobody misunderstand my intention - I truly like the idea (eBirds) and this database could be helpful, but ⦠There is usually a âbutâ, isnât it? It is not important how many and how long hours reviewers spend when checking records - what counts is quality not quantity. I read with quite interest these only few responses and it was not a surprise that only some regions are thought to do reviews adequately (hope more than listed). So another question needs to be asked: Who is guarding the guards? Evidently some reviewers are having problems with verifying records (hopefully they do not use vote method which is so often used on popular fora). IMHO another layer of guards checking guards could improve the situation so would removal of those who for whatever reason cannot correctly qualify records. I understand that this is a new project that still needs a lot improvements but there is no excuse to keep and accumulating worthless and misleading records. This database (eBirds) should not be a replacement for places where birders look for something to chase - Texbirds and other similar websites are good enough for that. BTW I only recently learned that there is difference between birder and bird watcher ⦠So birders have plenty of places to check for something to chase and records on eBirds should be rather delayed than incorrect. Often less is more ⦠Mark B Bartosik Houston, Texas _http://www.pbase.com/mbb/from_the_field_ (http://www.pbase.com/mbb/from_the_field) Edit your Freelists account settings for TEXBIRDS at //www.freelists.org/list/texbirds Reposting of traffic from TEXBIRDS is prohibited without seeking permission from the List Owner