[TCUG] Re: Wacky Ideas "sat-changes"
- From: "Parrett, Simon" <simon.parrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:36:11 +0100
Dear all,
I have been set thinking about detection strategy (VA and fixed time -
Gap-out) any views?
"You allocate a nice chunk of green to an approach so what happens? - the
drivers trickle through - the first 10-15 drivers know that they are going
to get through so what's the rush ? ....!"
I was wondering if anybody has looked at in introducing "sat-changes" or
even UTC "sat-outs" i.e. the signals changing should the current measured
running saturation flow on an approach fall below a threshold - as opposed
to gap-changes? (or is this already part of the MOVA strategy?)
Introducing such sat-changes might even lead to an overall increase in
sat-flows so we all benefit - especially if we up the thresholds year on
year.
Simon Parrett
Engineer Network Management
City of York Council
* * * * * * * * * * * *
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
This email represents the personal views of the author/sender. The
author/sender has no authority or delegation to bind the City of York
Council by this e-mail and the City of York Council accepts no
responsibility whatsoever for its contents. Please note that any reply to
this email may be screened.
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
Other related posts:
