This is going back to the Bus Priority query (from Paul Leighton - Walsall) in January: We in Leeds are looking at similar control of Ped crossings, in conjunction with the new AVL system the buses are getting. Indeed, on that subject we recently made a visit to Edinburgh - they have been allowing approaching buses to 'hold' ped crossings for some years now - to-date using tags but shortly using AVL. Our thinking is that while ped crossings contribute little to total bus delay, they can account for a lot of variability. Therefore it is significant. Chief problems: - what will peds accept - bus stops too close - bus coming the other way demanding a second inhibit. Whether peds accept the wait time depends on a lot of factors. We would not necessarily be increasing the peds' maximum wait time - on VA we could just be extending towards the max to get the bus through. Under UTC more sophisticated control techniques are necessary (but we have a few of those in mind!). The argument about ped priority is not simple. If we held an absolute view of ped priority all ped crossings would have an immediate response all the time. Generally speaking a ped crossing has a number of constraints governing when the ped gets a green. I do not see a problem with adding an approaching bus into the equation and taking action while considering all the other factors (provided we give peds a good deal at the times when buses are not present). Are you thinking of using an inhibit 'detector' followed by a cleardown 'detector'? (this can reduce problems of speed variation) However, like you we have not done anything yet, and expect to have an interesting and educating time commissioning Gordon Robertson UTMC Leeds City Council Phone 0113 24 76753 ________________________________________________________________________ The information in this email (and any attachment) may be for the intended recipient only. If you know you are not the intended recipient, please do not use or disclose the information in any way and please delete this email (and any attachment) from your system. Service of legal documents is not accepted by email ________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------- A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug