Doug didn't just reply to you.
to: "sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Douglas Losty <sparks06524@xxxxxxxxx>,
"Jr. D.J.J. Ring" <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
He sent one copy to the list, one copy directly to you, one copy directly
to himself (as a file copy) and one copy directly to me.
It is usual when replying to reply to all the addressees.
There were five additional links. You're coments on those?
I see you are "finished" with the discussion as if your one word determines
everything.
It only does in "RR Land".
You haven't replied to the message I sent you where you asked when you had
not replied to a challenge as to the accuracy of the statements you had
made.
I sent the reply (again) about your saying 1) that there was no evidence of
a historical Jesus in any of the contempory histories - which is false and
I sent you a quotaton and citation and 2) I sent you several times where
Jesus claimed he was God - one which was so bold for a Jew to actually use
the name that God had called Himself when speaking to Moses. You didn't
respond then and you haven't responded now.
So this is a pattern for you, you speak falsehoods, then you're corrected,
you don't then later repeat the falsehoods - which by this time you know
are false, so your action becomes that you lie.
I don't approve of people deliberately misleading others and lying.
You're certainly welcome to respond to the responses that have been made,
but to duck and run away and then come back and spring the same lies on us,
is unwelcome here.
73
DR
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
DR,
Actually I already did respond to his post but because he sent it directly
to me I responded directly to him.
This is what I wrote:
Yes I saw that. A little strange don't you think that they didn't find
this grave until 2014, 59 years later.
"*After digging three small test trenches to confirm each mass grave,
Colls and her team reburied the remains.* Jewish rabbinical law prohibits
the disruption of a gravesite, so the aim was never to disinter the bodies.
*But
placing the bones back in the grave was emotionally difficult, Colls said.*
"
Proof positive, and completely unbiased.
Happy now? If you have no further questions then I am done discussing this
subject.
-RR
-----Original Message-----
From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr."
Sent: Dec 18, 2016 8:15 PM
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: A real math problem
Someone provided some new informative that contradicts what you say.
Your usual tactic is to ignore such information so you can continue in
reputed ignorance.
Care to comment about the newly found trench graves with hundreds of
thousands of dead bodies?
DR
On Dec 18, 2016 8:36 PM, "Ron Ristad" <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
DR,
AKA censorship.
I have only been responding to Stan's challenges. The problem with Stan
is that he always wants to get the last word in. I went as far as to block
his and your posts in order to put an end to it. I can, and will do it
again if Stan keeps challenging me about the Holocaust.
I knew absolutely nothing about WWII before this discussion started
except what was told to me by the mainstream media since I was a kid, and
now I have learned all I need to know. It has really opened my eyes about a
lot things.
One of the reasons why I find WWII so interesting is because the real
reasons for it were never resolved, and now I see the country and world
entering into a period just like it in many ways, even to the point of
having a democratically elected populist president who is opposed by the
left that tells all sorts of lies about him and is doing everything they
can to overthrow him.
But as long as nobody else wants to discuss the Holocaust story then
neither do I.
-RR
-----Original Message-----
From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr."
Sent: Dec 18, 2016 6:41 PM
To: "sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: A real math problem
Doug,
I usually let my lists self-police. You've given RR some ammo but what
he usually does is ignore what contradicts what he believes.
If he keeps it up, I will moderate him.
Or maybe I'll let Stanley moderate him - that would be good "turn-around"
letting the person RR blocked, moderate him.
73
DR
