[SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- From: "handw0522" <handw0522@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 01:43:26 -0000
The loosely coupled pair is easier to route but seems to lower noise
immunity. Is there any mechanism to balance loosely coupled and noise
immunity ?
Thanks,
Jeff
--- In si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Kai Keskinen" <kalevi@xxxx> wrote:
> One quick way to determine loose or close coupling is to look at
the single
> ended and differential impedances. If the differential impedance is
much
> less than twice the single ended impedance for the same track
width, (i.e.
> 50 single, 90 differential), you have closely coupled lines. If the
> impedance is slightly less (i.e. 50 Ohms single, 97-100
differential, you
> are loosely coupled). The loosely coupled pair is easier to route
with
> minimal differential impedance discontinuities if you have to go
around vias
> or other obstructions by breaking up the diff pair.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: si-list-bounce@xxxx
> [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxx]On Behalf Of Rick Brooks
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 6:34 PM
> To: Cortex.Chen@xxxx
> Cc: si-list@xxxx
> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
>
>
> I'm not sure this is what you are looking for or not...
>
> There is a description in Ron Poon's book: Computer Circuits
Electrical
> Design, pg 198.
> He defines a magnetic coupling coefficient km and a capacitive
coupling
> coefficient kc
> with regard to coupled transmission lines
>
> km = Lm/(SQRT(L1*L2))
> kc = Cm/(SQRT(C1*C2))
>
> Lm and Cm are mutual inductance and mutual capacitance per unit
length
> L1 and L2 are self inductance and capacitance per unit length.
>
> As a rough guideline: if km and kc are less than 0.2, the lines are
said to
> have "loose" coupling.
>
>
> I hope it helps,
> - Rick
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 07:30 PM 11/30/2004 +0800, Cortex Chen wrote:
> >Dear Abe Riazi,
> >How to determine the tightly and loosely coupled pairs?
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Cortex
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >si-list-request@xxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >
> >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> >http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >
> >For help:
> >si-list-request@xxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >
> >List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> >
> >List technical documents are available at:
> > http://www.si-list.org
> >
> >List archives are viewable at:
> > http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >or at our remote archives:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.org
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.org
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- From: Kai Keskinen
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- » [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- [SI-LIST] Re: symmetry vs length matching for diff signals
- From: Kai Keskinen