[SI-LIST] maybe some oversight in ebd defination?

From: "cat" <cat_carl@xxxxxxxxx>
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:11:46 -0800

Hello,si-list,
     I think the description of [path description]section of the ebd file is 
not detailed enough.I got confused when I meet such condition:
Node A
Len=0 L=2 C=1
Node B

Should I represent it like this:                   
                 
                 
   B <---@@@@@----------|--------------->A
         L=1            |
                        |
                       === C=1
                        |
                       ---
or like this:
                        

   B <-------|------------@@@@@------------>A
             |              L
             |
             |
           =====C
             |
            ---
By the way,should the capacitor be connected to ground or power? How to 
determine this ?
In fact , I found many cases like the above one in the DIMM ebd file supplied 
by molex.
Maybe both representation is just the same? Or there is some description I did 
not noticed?Or this is really a oversight?
any response will be appreciated.
   cat
                cat_carl@xxxxxxxxx
                    2003-09-19

                     With best regards


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu

[SI-LIST] maybe some oversight in ebd defination?

Other related posts: