Jim, Just back from vacation, so my mind isn't back in gear yet (still golfing). I assume you are talking about edge coupled ustrip and strip lines. What formulas are you using (in addition to simulation software)? I'm not getting the connection between plane thickness and crosstalk as a dominant coupling capacitance. For edge coupled ustrips there are three mutual capacitances to account for in odd mode: 1. Cs - the mutual coupling capacitance considering the effect of er only. 2. Cso - the mutual coupling capacitance considering the effect of eo only 3. Ct - the mutual coupling capacitance due to strip thickness, considering the effect of eo only. Although Ct is linear with increasing thickness, the dominant capacitance, Cso, is an order of magnitude greater than Ct. Cso is independent of trace thickness. For even mode, the mutual fringing capacitance is independent of thickness. All of the above is relevant to traces, not planes. So you can see my confusion. Can you clarify? Thanks, Ken -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Peterson, James F (FL51) Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 6:18 AM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: copper thickness of a ref plane Michael, the driver for moving to 1/2 oz. copper is clearance through the pin fields of the connectors. i have to stay 12 mils away from the pads of a pci connector on a ground plane if the plane is 1 oz. - if it's 1/2 oz., then i only have to stay 8 mils away. this allows more copper through the pin fields on my ref planes. regards, Jim -----Original Message----- From: Greim, Michael [mailto:mgreim@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 4:59 PM To: 'si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: copper thickness of a ref plane Make sure that the ampacity of a half ounce plane is adequate for your needs. What is driving your decision to head in this direction? There may be a better alternative. Best Regards, Michael C. Greim Sonus Networks mgreim@xxxxxxxxxxxx 978-589-8336 Making the world safe for digital signals everywhere And all this science I don't understand It's just my job six days a week The time is gone. The email's over Thought I'd something more to say...... -----Original Message----- From: Peterson, James F (FL51) [mailto:james.f.peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 4:31 PM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] copper thickness of a ref plane Because of physical limitations, I am considering reducing all of the ref planes on a design to 1/2 oz. copper (was 1 oz. copper). The board level logic is 3.3V CMOS. Does anybody see any problems with doing this? thanks, Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu