The following URL points to a document that outlines how a decent spice model for a ferrite component may be created. Also shown is the response of 'not-well-behaved' filter and sample responses of filters that have been 'tamed'. The slides shown in the document have been extracted from a training presentation I did a while back. http://www.si-list.org/files/tech_files/power_filt.pdf The spice model shown utilizes the G element. The original method was published by Michael Wyatt in the Oct. 15, 1992 issue of Electronic Design magazine and later reprinted in the Microsim Application Notes Handbook (Version 6, 1994). The resulting model is created from measured/published Impedance and phase angle information. One page in the document compares the raw data from the vendors data sheet to the response of the synthesized spice model. The correlation is excellent and the two curves are very nearly indistinguishable from each other. Note that while this method depends on Z and phase angle info, if you have measured or published s-parameter data available there are several programs in existance that can produce nice 'black-box' models from the s-parameter data. It really isn't practical to massage the s-parameter numbers into a spice model by hand, but you can simply synthesize a model from the Z data. Note also that the S element in Hspice (and at least a couple other spice variants) can directly accept s-parameter data. All lumped element approximation models of ferrite components that I've seen fail to accurately reflect the non-linear impedance versus frequency characteristics of most ferrite components over more than a very narrow frequency range. It seems that models based on measured data, be it Z or S are the most accurate means of modeling ferrite components as opposed to lumped element approximations. The si-list.org web site still needs a bunch of work done on the menu structure etc., but the above URL leads directly to the relevant document. -Ray Anderson Staff SI Engineer Sun Microsystems Inc. Dav0 Lieby wrote: >I understand that the bead is a little >lossy. It is also an inductor. In the >instance that I talked about I calculated >the inductance by using the impedance at >frequency numbers associated with the >bead. This gives a rough inductance >number. The inductance is much higher >than the package would indicate alone. >Take a look at some curves. > >dav0 >David Lieby >Siemens Medical Systems, Ultrasound Division > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu