Perhaps others, who are more familiar with this than I, can comment also, however, here are my thoughts on the subject: 1) I would think that the internal field solver would take into account current crowding in conductors caused by the proximity of other conductors. The output of the field solver will be a set of RLGC matrices that will be fed to the W element model. 2) The 'gotcha' is that the W element model scales the skin effect loss by the sqrt(f). I think this is valid if we can assume equal current flow on all sides of a conductor. However, when the proximity effect take over and current is not equally distributed around the periphery of the conductor I have a feeling that the sqrt(f) dependence of the skin effect changes to some other function. If so, the skin effect losses modeled by the W element will lose accuracy. Can anyone else comment on this? As I mentioned, I'm not an expert on this and would welcome any informed input/correction on the matter. -Ray Anderson Sun Microsystems Inc. > > >I have searched the SI-LIST archives and actually came across a thread >on the HSPICE w-element field solver from June of this year. >Unfortunately the responses in the thread did not address the original >question. (They did, however give lots of useful information on >dielectric loss of FR-4) > >At any rate I am beginning a system design which will use 2.5 Gbit/sec >differential signalling with Infiniband type of signal >characteristics. My question is whether the HSPICE internal field >solver (which I have not yet used) includes the effects of proximity >of differential lines when it calculates the line losses. I assume >that when two PWB traces are "tightly coupled" as has been discussed >in this forum, the currents in the traces at high frequencies crowd >towards the surface due to skin effect AND crowd towards the near >edges of the traces due to proximity effect. Does anyone know of any >good resources that specifically discuss the proximity effect at GHz >frequencies? I would think that for signal edge rates on the order of >50 ps this could have a profound effect on losses. > >Several years ago I used a tool called SIMIAN out of U Texas which I >believed included proximity effect. If the HSPICE field solver does >not include these effects does anyone know of another tool which does? > >Chris > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu