[SI-LIST] Re: J.L. Prince (Influcence of a floating plane......) Arizonauniversity

  • From: "Jean Audet" <jaudet@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Loyer, Jeff" <jeff.loyer@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 15:00:28 -0400

Jeff, into the paper , they specified that eddy current created in the
floating plane influence the coupling between signal and ground (making the
partial mutual inductance lower and consequently the Leff worse)

I made quick  quasistatic simulation  and I got better Leff. I'll take a
deeper look

Jean Audet
Electrical Analysis
World Wide Packaging & Test
IBM Burlington
Tel: 802-769-0835, tie line: 446-0835
Tel: 450-534-6317, tie line: 552-6317
E-mail: jaudet@xxxxxxxxxx



                                                                                
                                                       
                      "Loyer, Jeff"                                             
                                                       
                      <jeff.loyer@intel        To:       Jean 
Audet/Bromont/IBM@IBMCA, <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>                         
                      .com>                    cc:                              
                                                       
                                               Subject:  RE: [SI-LIST] J.L. 
Prince (Influcence of a floating plane......) Arizona      
                      05/16/2003 02:32          university                      
                                                       
                      PM                                                        
                                                       
                                                                                
                                                       
                                                                                
                                                       



A quick note, since no-one else replied.

This is contrary to my intuition and what a simple XFX simulation shows.
Adding a 2nd plane above the signal lowers Leff in that simulation.  So,
I'm surprised also.

without plane above:
 i    j      Lij      Cij      Ze     Zo       Se     So      Fwdx   Rvsx
from  to   (nh/in)  (pf/in)  (ohms) (ohms)   (ns/ft)(ns/ft)   (s/s)  (v/v)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1   1     8.963    1.363    81.09    -       1.33    -        -     -

with plane (conductor 2)above
 i    j      Lij      Cij      Ze     Zo       Se     So      Fwdx   Rvsx
from  to   (nh/in)  (pf/in)  (ohms) (ohms)   (ns/ft)(ns/ft)   (s/s)  (v/v)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1   1     7.076    3.075    49.35    -       1.72    -        -     -
  1   2     0.506    2.378   104.25  34.71     0.87   2.27   -0.890  0.500
  2   2     1.018   16.383     8.18    -       1.49    -        -     -

Jeff Loyer


-----Original Message-----
From: Jean Audet [mailto:jaudet@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 9:56 AM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] J.L. Prince (Influcence of a floating plane......)
Arizona university



Around 1996-1997, a presentation have been done by University of Arizona
about the '' Influence of a Floating Plane on Effective Ground Plane in
Thin Film Multilayer and Lead Frame package''

Into this presentation,  the effective inductance simulation for a
multilayer package having floating plane above is worst than whitout
floating plane.
Basically the structure (x-section) is the following

Floating plane
Signal
Ground plane

The Leff graph shows a Leff lower for structure whitout floating plane. I'm
little surprise about the simulation results.
Is someone has more data about that... or maybe M. Prince may reply if he
is in the distribution list

Also I have only a hard copy of this presentation, Is someone else has a
soft copy ?


Jean Audet
Electrical Analysis
World Wide Packaging & Test
IBM Burlington
Tel: 802-769-0835, tie line: 446-0835
Tel: 450-534-6317, tie line: 552-6317
E-mail: jaudet@xxxxxxxxxx



------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:
                         //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                         http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                         http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu






------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts:

  • » [SI-LIST] Re: J.L. Prince (Influcence of a floating plane......) Arizonauniversity