[SI-LIST] Re: Inductance of wire section

  • From: "Mark Potter" <mpotter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bill.panos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <si@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:16:43 -0700

Kim,

The ARRL Handbook for Radio Amateurs is a great reference for this also, =
including information for winding your own transformers

Mark Potter
Lead Applications Engineer
PCB Systems Division
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
16279 Laguna Canyon Road
Irvine, CA  92618=20
___________________________________________=20
Cadence Support Hotline:1-877-CDS-4911=20
Cadence Sales: 1-800-671-9505
Online 24-hour Customer Support, visit SourceLink:=20
http://sourcelink.cadence.com=20
To View/Enter Service Requests online:
http://sourcelink.cadence.com/en/ccscase/CaseList.jhtml=20
For PCB product information and product updates visit:
http://cadencepcb.com=20
For PSpice product and industry news visit:
http://www.orcadpcb.com=20
For SPECCTRAQuest product and industry news, visit:
http://www.specctraquest.com
____________________________________________=20


-----Original Message-----
From: bpanos [mailto:bill.panos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]=20
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:05 PM
To: si@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Inductance of wire section


Kim-
Frederick Terman gives some brief background and assumptions about the =
formula everyone has been mentioning, in his book:  Electronic and Radio =
Engineering (written back in the 40's it is still applicable today) =
-Bill


Kim Flint wrote:

> Hi-
> I'm curious about assumptions made in some of these inductance=20
> formulas. I understand inductance as requiring a coil of wire, wherein =

> magnetic flux would intersect the area of the coil. "Inductance of a=20
> wire segment" doesn't really mean anything without understanding where =

> the rest of the current path forming our coil is located. So I'm=20
> guessing these formulas are approximations based on some set of=20
> assumed conditions, like height above ground or something like that?=20
> Does anybody know what those assumptions are in this case? I'd like to =

> understand where I can expect this formula to be reasonably valid.
>
> thanks!
> kim
>
> At 08:57 AM 9/5/2003, Stuart Brorson wrote:
> >Hi Guys --
> >
> >Thanks for all your answers.  I used the following formula from Bart:
> >
> >L  =3D  K * length * [ ln(4*length/Diam) - 0.75 ]
> >
> >L      =3D Inductance in nanohenries
> >D      =3D Diameter of wire in cm
> >length =3D Length of wire in cm
> >K      =3D 2
> >
> >stuck it into Gnumeric (Linux-based Excel replacement), and got the=20
> >following answers:
> >
> >                 Unit    qnty    qnty    qnty
> >K                       2       2       2
> >Length          cm      1       1       1
> >Diam            cm      0.08    0.06    0.04
> >
> >Inductance      nH      6.324   6.899   7.710
> >
> >depending upon the wire diameter.  Using the below figure of 20nH/in, =

> >and knowing that 1in =3D 2.54cm, I get L =3D 7.87 nH.
> >
> >Therefore, I think we have nailed it: L =3D 7nH/cm +/- 10% or so.
> >
> >Thanks again for all the answers!
> >
> >Stuart
> >
> > >
> > > Hi Stuart: The ROT I use is 20nH/in.
> > > BTW, I verifed this using a 2D extractor
> > > and increasing the boundary distance far
> > > away from the wire to minimize mutual indutance.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hope this helps
> > >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >
> >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:=20
> >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >
> >For help:
> >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >
> >List archives are viewable at:
> >                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >or at our remote archives:
> >                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> >                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:=20
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List archives are viewable at:
>                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
>                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>


-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: text/x-vcard
-- File: bill.panos.vcf
-- Desc: Card for bpanos


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: =
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:    =20
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages=20
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
 =20

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: