I agree with this poster's comments. I have spent 10 seconds reading the original question and 4 minutes reading all the flaming and commentary about it. If you don't want to contribute on this list to the development of lesser experienced engineers, that is your prerogative. However if you are a member of the IEEE, you have attested to the code of ethics which can be found at http://www.ieee.org/portal/index.jsp?pageID=corp_level1&path=about/whatis&fil ðo J$XÖÿ¿?Ñ@D×ÿ¿??e=code.xml&xsl=generic.xsl[1] and which reads in part: "We ... agree: "5. to improve the understanding of technology, its appropriate application, and potential consequences;" "10. to assist colleagues and co-workers in their professional development and to support them in following this code of ethics." If a posting is clearly off topic, it is appropriate for the moderator to refer the poster to the FAQs for the list. My advice to those of you who feel you are above answering such questions is to learn to be more tolerant of others and if you don't want to assist the poster, delete their message from your folder and move on. You will have more time to dwell on your own ego, and the rest of the world will be a better place. ======================================================= Ron Bader <ronb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Bader Engineering http://www.badereng.com[2] Celebrating 23 Years of Excellence in Product Development Services ======================================================= At 09:45 AM 10/1/04, Finlayson Joe-G3162C wrote: I am primarily a lurker and find much of the information posted on this list very useful. I am also subscribed to many other lists where my background allows me to be more interactive. I am a bit surprised at the tone taken when someone of lesser experience in a particular area asks a valid question that seems to be well within the scope of this list. I just went to the http://www.si-list.org/[3] and read the following: "si-list currently has over 3500 subscribers from around the world. The members range from experts in the field in both industry and academia to students and others interested in learning about the subject." And "...Now almost 11 years later we have about 3500 subscribers to si-list. Theyrange from students just getting their feet wet in engineering to world renown experts in the field. They hail from both industry and academia in just about every country in the world that is involved in signal integrity related endeavors." And "The original precept for si-list was to provide a forum for the exchange of technical conversation related to Signal Integrity and related fields. Over the years we have endeavored to keep the majority of the list traffic on the technical level and to discourage the use of the forum for advertising and head-hunting. To that end I think we have been remarkably successful." Can someone explain to me, maybe the list administrator, why a technical question such as the one posed is not the level of topic that should be posted on the si-list? Responses such as I have just seen tells the up-and-coming SI engineers to take a back seat and leave the questions posed on this list to the professionals. Thx, Joe Finlayson Motorola --- Links --- 1 http://www.ieee.org/portal/index.jsp?pageID=corp_level1&path=about/whatis&file=code.xml&xsl=generic.xsl 2 http://www.badereng.com/ 3 http://www.si-list.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu