[SI-LIST] Re: High Impedance Traces are prone to Radio Frequency Interference
- From: "Steve Rogers" <SRogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <guanchoon.lim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:17:37 +0100
I am not sure where your information comes from but I don't really agree =
with it. Heres some food for thought...
Draw two simple series circuits near each other one consisting of =
source, source resistance a track then a load resistasnce. The other =
circuit having a source resistance a track then a load resitance. Lets =
call one the source and the other the victim. Now first off link the two =
tracks in the middle of the circuits together with a capacitor to model =
parasitic capacitance or electric field coupling between the two =
circuits. You will find that the maximum signal transfer from one =
circuit to the other occurs with a high impedance circuit at the victim.
Now change the coupling so you have an inductor in series in each =
circuit which is coupled to the other circuit (transformer coupling if =
you like). This time when you do the sums you will find that the low =
impedance at the victim circuit is the one to avoid. This coupling =
mechanism is magnetic of H field coupling. This occurs with low =
impedance high current things near each other.
There is one other type of coupling which you need to be aware of. This =
is antenna coupling. In very simple terms you will have structures on =
your board that are resonant at certain frequencies. At this frequency =
the structure behaves like a good antenna to signals at the resonant =
frequency and is therefore prone to pick up or to radiate energy at that =
frequency.=20
The High impedance problem is normally quite easy to avoid given that =
electric fields are easily screened by thin metal screening cans around =
any circuits prone to this affect. The low impedance magnetic field =
problem on the other hand can be a little more problematic. If the =
energy is low frequency energy the shielding required can be =
inpractically large.=20
In all cases the best way out is to put physical distance between source =
and victim. You will also note if you have done the sums on the circuits =
mentioned above that the source and load impedances can be changed to =
help.=20
We could go of forever on this one
The subject is covered will in all good EMC / RF books
Hope my input gave you a start
Steve Rogers B.Eng (Hons) C.Eng IEE
RF Design Engineer
Micromill Electronics Limited
Leydene House
Waterberry Drive=20
Waterlooville Hampshire
PO7 7XX
Tel: +44 (0) 23 9236 6600
Fax: +44 (0) 23 9236 6673
Registered No. 1456922 (England). =20
Registered Office Brook Road
Wimborne, Dorset BH21 2BJ
***********************************************************************
"This email and any attached files are confidential and may be legally =
privileged.If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, =
reproduction,copying, distribution,, or other dissemination or use of =
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this =
transmission in error please notify the sender immediately and then =
delete this email.
It is the policy of Micromill Electronics Limited that no legally =
binding statements, representations or commitments (collectively =
'statements') may be made by email. Any such statements must be =
confirmed either by facsimilie or by post before they will have legal =
effect. The sender of this email is not authorised to commit the company =
in any way and the addressee is hereby formally notified of that fact."
***********************************************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: Lim Guan Choon [mailto:guanchoon.lim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 9:31 AM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] High Impedance Traces are prone to Radio Frequency
Interference
Hi, all. Could anyone help to explain why high impedance traces are =
=3D
prone to Radio frequency interference? I have come across this kind of =
=3D
remark in articles, but no explanation why it is so. Please help.
Warmest regards
Lim
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at: =20
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages=20
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
=20
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System. For more information on a proactive email security
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
