[SI-LIST] Fw: Re: source synchronous constraint
- From: zanglinyuan <zanglinyuan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:51:02 +0800
----- Original Message -----
From: zanglinyuan
To: Scott McMorrow
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] Re: source synchronous constraint
Hi.Scott
you'are right.
The system is RGMII interface,yes -- It is a same edge source synchronous
system without additional strobe delay.
I think the problem is the setup/hold time from the datasheet is the min.
time data around the strobe.
For example,at the transmitter data around the strobe is min. +/-1ns ,and at
the receiver the requirement is min.
+2.5ns/-0.5ns,and the period is 8ns(125Mhz),but I think the valid data time
must be greater than the 2ns(derived form +/-1ns),maybe smaller than the period
(8ns).
If above mentioned right, the question is the data is positive to strobe or
negative to strobe?
See the following diagram and question:
_________________
/ \
strobe__________/| \__________________
______|__________
data / | \
--------- \______|__________/----------
1)min.setup time + min. hold time=min.data valid time?
2) if above not equal,the data trends to offset which side(setup or hold) ?
thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott McMorrow
To: zanglinyuan@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] Re: source synchronous constraint
Zanglinyuan,
To add to my previous comments, standard DDR type source synchronous
architecture resolve this problem by delaying the strobe edge by 1/4 of a two
bit period (1/2 a strobe period) at either the driver or at the receiver. If
that is the case with your system, then there is most likely no problem. Same
edge source synchronous systems with no additional strobe delay can be
problematic.
regards,
scott
--
Scott McMorrow
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
2926 SE Yamhill St.
Portland, OR 97214
(503) 239-5536
http://www.teraspeed.com
zanglinyuan wrote:
Hi. Scott
It is a typical source synchronous system .
as follows:
____ _____
| | strobe | |
| |------------| |
|TX | | RX |
| | data | |
|___ |----------- |_____|
TX----transceiver
RX----recevier
The TX parameter is the transceiver ouput data relative to strobe.
The RX parameter is the receiver input requirement for data relative to strobe.
The strobe's active edge is rising edge.
The key problem is the tranceiver ouput parameter does't match the receiver's
input requirement ,
how to deal with PCB'S routing ?
(TX:setuptime=1ns,holdtime=1ns
RX:setuptime=2.5ns,holdtime=0.5ns )
thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott McMorrow <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <zanglinyuan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] source synchronous constraint
Zanglingyuan,
It is not clear what your Tx parameters are. Is this a double data rate
source synchronous system where the setup and hold times are relative to
the Tx strobe/clock? If so, what edge of the strobe is the active edge.
Are the Rx setup and hold parameters relative to the same strobe/clock
edge?
regards,
scott
--
Scott McMorrow
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
2926 SE Yamhill St.
Portland, OR 97214
(503) 239-5536
http://www.teraspeed.com
zanglinyuan wrote:
Hi:
I am designing some source synchronous system,and need to make PCB routing
constraint.
However,the timing parameter for tranceiver and reciever does not match each
other,
for example :
TX:setuptime=1ns,holdtime=1ns
RX:setuptime=2.5ns,holdtime=0.5ns
even so,I don't think the system won't work if we just route the clk/data's PCB
length within
some tolerance,because the datasheet does't give the valid data time which is
very important for
the PCB constraint to be made.
what's the right way to deal with such case? that's how to make the PCB
routing constraint for this case?
Thanks a lot in advance.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Fw: Re: source synchronous constraint
- From: Vinu Arumugham
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Fw: Re: source synchronous constraint
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Fw: Re: source synchronous constraint
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Fw: Re: source synchronous constraint
- [SI-LIST] Re: Fw: Re: source synchronous constraint
- From: Vinu Arumugham