[ SHOWGSD-L ] PAWS Alert -- ACTION NEEDED! -- Please Forward

  • From: "Ginger Cleary" <cleary1414@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Showgsd-L@Freelists. Org" <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:02:58 -0500

 Ginger Cleary,Rome, GA  ww.rihadin.com
The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human
hands, will ever be liable to abuse. ? James Madison
Member GSDCA
Member Sawnee Mtn Kennel Club
GA Director Responsible Dog Owners of the Eastern States.
  -----Original Message-----


  Walt Hutchens
  waltah@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  wrote:
    PAWS is back, and if we don't fight it now, it is very likely to
    become law. This post has everything you need to start.

    H.R. 2419 (House of Representatives bill 2419) is the 2007 farm bill;
    it would provide almost 300 BILLION dollars in government money for
    thousands of different purposes considered farm-related over a five
    year period but it also makes many other changes to federal law.

    This bill has passed the House of Representatives and is now in the
    Senate where it has already been through the Senate Agriculture
    Committee. It is now being debated (a bit now and a bit then) on the
    Senate floor.

    With that much money in play, the Senate naturally has its own ideas.
    Those ideas are in SA (Senate Amendment) 3500, "An amendment in the
    nature of a substitute" which translates as "This is what WE think the
    farm bill should look like." Nobody on earth has read the whole
    thing, but we can guess that while it looks a lot like HR 2419, there
    are hundreds of tweaks up, down, and sideways, a few of them big
    deals.

    SA 3500 has itself been amended a few hundred times and one of those
    amendments is SA 3723 -- our old friend 'PAWS,' but with some new
    problems.

    With this many changes in play, it is most likely that the Senate WILL
    pass SA 3500, BUT PROBABLY ONLY AFTER MORE CHANGES. The Senate version
    of H.R. 2419 will then go to a House-Senate Conference Committee to
    work out the differences. The CC can be guaranteed to make yet more
    changes.

    The conference version of H.R. 2419 will then go to both the House and
    Senate to be passed: Both houses must pass a bill in EXACTLY the same
    form. Once H.R. 2419 has passed both houses it goes to the president
    for signature -- that's usually a routine matter, although President
    Bush has been threatening a veto over one of the provisions of the
    current bill.

    So, while SA 3500 is technically not part of the farm bill yet, we
    believe it does contain SA 3723 at this time and that SA 3500 in some
    form WILL become H.R. 2419. Thus, we need to start worrying AND
    ACTING, now.

    The first and best place to kill PAWS is to get SA 3723 removed on the
    Senate floor, where it is now. To do that, write to your own (U.S.)
    Senators asking that they remove SA 3723 from SA 3500.

    You can use all of last year's talking points. The new PAWS would
    apply USDA regulations written for commercial farm breeders to
    everyone who breeds and sells more than 25 puppies/kittens and also
    goes over six litters in a year, as well as to anyone selling over 25
    bred elsewhere. Like last year's version, PAWS would essentially end
    the home breeding of pedigreed cats in the U.S. and would seriously
    damage the home breeding of dogs. This would mean that more pets would
    be bred by large commercial breeders. Overall, the result will be
    lower quality cats and dogs at higher prices, meaning more incentive
    for illegal breeding and importing of pets, already a problem in some
    parts of the U.S.

    You can find many more talking points for PAWS in Cindy Cooke's
    excellent letter posted on December 4th, #69157 on the pet-law list.
    Another PAWS article by Cindy is at:

    http://www.pet-law.com/paws/why.html

    The text of the bill itself is at:

    http://www.cfa.org/exhibitors/HR2419.pdf

    You can see what the law (the Animal Welfare Act) would look like with
    the new PAWS merged in, here; the new stuff is about 2/3 down the
    page:

    http://www.cfa.org/exhibitors/SA3723.pdf

    To contact your Senators:

    http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/

    You can enter your zip code or just click on your state. Then click
    'senators' and the name of each Senator to get the Washington D.C.
    office fax number. FAX is important because the time is short; email
    is not even close to equally effective.

    OR just go to the CFA Alerts page and click on the list of Senators
    and phone numbers -- it's alphabetical by state abbreviation.

    http://www.cfa.org/exhibitors/alerts.html

    This is IMPORTANT. Think of it as breeder licensing for all 50 states
    at a single whack; while it won't get the smallest breeders of dogs
    right away, it will be easily amended in future years to take out more
    of us. And home breeding of pedigreed cats will be gone from the
    beginning.

    -- Be polite!

    -- Your first sentence should say what you want: "I am writing to ask
    that you have SA 3723 removed from SA 3500, the Senate version of the
    2007 farm bill."

    -- Say something about yourself that relates to why this matters to
    you: "My wife and I breed one or two litters of whippets per year in
    our home in southern Virginia."

    -- Explain what you think are the worst things about PAWS. This
    should be just two or three sentences. Whatever scares you most from
    the discussions on pet-law or various other resources.

    -- Again say what you want: "Please work to have SA 3723 removed from
    the Senate version of the farm bill."

    -- USE YOUR OWN WORDS. Form letters are ignored.

    -- Sign, and include your name and address; it's a good idea to
    include a phone number, too, in case the Senator wants clarification
    of your views.

    Can you get friends, other club members, maybe your vet to send
    letters?

    For even more impact, CALL the senator's office and ask to speak to
    the person who handles farm bill matters for him. Explain your views
    to that person, be sure to get his or her name, and follow up with a
    letter as above, adding a sentence near the beginning, saying
    something like "This is in follow up to my conversation with Ms. Jones
    of your staff, on Thursday."

    GO FOR IT, FOLKS. WE DO NOT WANT PAWS TO PASS!

    Walt Hutchens
    Timbreblue Whippets

  __._,_.___

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.15/1174 - Release Date: 12/6/2007
10:11 AM


============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2007.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
============================================================================

Other related posts:

  • » [ SHOWGSD-L ] PAWS Alert -- ACTION NEEDED! -- Please Forward