[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: My Choice
- From: "Sally" <sally@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <arycrest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 16:55:53 -0600
Gayle
Yes certain missing teeth are considered serious faults but If a judge
refuses to consider an other wise lovely animal due to a missing tooth the
judge has just become a fault judge- I seriously doubt we want our judges
to eliminate animals for one missing tooth.
If the animal with the missing tooth is not good quality he isn't going to
win or place anyway.
I for one would put up a dog I consider worthy of points with a missing
tooth. I would not consider putting up what I consider a lesser quality
with a full mouth
sally
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2005. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org
============================================================================
Other related posts:
