[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Breeding stock? long

  • From: "Helen Franklin" <helen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <Stormy435@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:04:46 -0700

I am against PAWS....and what I wrote has NOTHING to do with it 
....what-so-ever!
Helen
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Stormy435@xxxxxxx 
  To: helen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:45 PM
  Subject: Re: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Breeding stock? long

  This from another list:  Very apropos to Breeding Stock, I think

  Names deleted except for Loretta, publisher of a sporting dog magazine.

  This is what Senator Santorum and the Animal Rights groups backing PAWS are
  counting on... that people will say: "I don't breed that many litters, so it
  won't affect me"; "Anyone who breeds that many litters should be regulated to 
be
  sure they are doing it "right"";
  "The prospect of regulation will discourage hobby breeders from breeding so 
much
  and that is good". On the surface, these thought may have merit. However, the
  problem with PAWS is that the Animal Rights groups involved have come out and
  said that it is only a "first step" in enacting their aganda goals. IF PAWS 
does
  pass, you can bet they will work dilligently to lower the number limits. They
  won't stop until they are successful at putting an end to all pet breeding and
  ownership. There is another part of PAWS that states a person is a "dealer" if
  they sell "hunting, security or breeding dogs". This could mean that anyone 
who
  sells a breed of dog that hunts or a non-spayed/non-neutered pup/dog would be
  considered to be a "dealer". It won't matter whether or not YOU actually hunt
  your dog - just that the breed is considered to be a hunting breed.
  It is particularly alarming because right now, AKC is in the process of 
changing
  their puppy registration forms. The box on the puppy registration form that a
  breeder checks if they want the pup to be sold on a limited registration is 
now
  darkened in with diagonal lines. Current forms are transitional, according to 
a
  woman in AKC's customer service department who I spoke with. But the forms 
will
  soon be all limited registration as a default - unless the breeder fills in 
some
  special numbers on the form. All breeders will soon be getting a breeder ID
  number from AKC. Now consider this. A breeder sells a pup with full rights...
  well, AKC has it in writing that you sold an intact pup thus, YOU ARE A
  DEALER!!!
  PAWS is not simply a law to deal with the "puppy mill" problem as AKc and 
others
  promoting it are claiming. It is a poorly written piece of legislation that 
has
  the potential to be very dangerous to our involvement with our dogs.
  Unfortunately, most of the Senators and Representatives are under the 
impression
  that it is just about "puppy mills" and they are lending their support.
  We must stop PAWS.
  ~Loretta

  ** The above was in response to the email below....

  I don't doubt that there are a few people who breed more than six litters a 
year
  who are relatively responsible breeders. It would be close to a full-time job
  to breed more than six litters a year and to do it right, however, what with 
all
  the puppy care, socialization, owner screening and keeping track of and
  following up on increasing numbers of dogs one is responsible for every year.
  (And taking back all the puppies who don't work out in their original homes).
  And, sadly, lots and lots of people who breed more than six litters a year are
  NOT responsible breeders. Nobody is saying that it will be illegal to breed
  more than six litters a year under PAWS, just that people who do it should
  expect closer government scrutiny. I think that is a good thing. It will
  absolutely discourage some "hobby" breeders who breed to make money and who 
are
  not remotely doing it right, while not affecting the majority of responsible,
  caring breeders a bit. As to your comment that people should be allowed to
  breed more than six litters a year "provided that they do a good job of it," I
  agree. Regulation and inspection is a way to determine whether or not they are
  doing a good job of it. In my experience, the VAST majority of people who
  breed more than six litters a year don't do a very good job of it.






  *^*\/\/\/\/*^**^*\/\/\/\/*^**^*\/\/\/\/*^*
  Dog's love is different, it requires no return
  www.FairhopeGSD.com

============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2005.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org
============================================================================

Other related posts: