[sanesecurity] Re: FP on INetMsg.SpamDomain-2w.en25_com - again...
- From: "Bill Landry" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sanesecurity@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:47:48 -0700
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:37:27AM -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
>>
>> I stand by my statement. Your results do not even come close to mine.
>
> Pretty definite. Could you atleast post the stats with little description
> of
> your setup?
Even though I am not the one making the claims, here are some quick stats
from one of my servers thus far today.
Matching both INetMsg and any URIBL:
egrep -c "INetMsg.*URIBL" /var/log/maillog
205
Matching only INetMsg and no URIBL:
egrep "INetMsg" /var/log/maillog | egrep -vc URIBL
176
As you can see, not even close to a 95% match. And yes, all are confirmed
spam. The URIBLs that I use are:
===============
multi.uribl.com
===============
URIBL_RED
URIBL_GREY
URIBL_BLACK
===============
multi.surbl.org
===============
URIBL_PH_SURBL
URIBL_JP_SURBL
URIBL_SC_SURBL
URIBL_WS_SURBL
URIBL_OB_SURBL
URIBL_AB_SURBL
===========
Stand Alone
===========
URIBL_RHS_DOB
URIBL_SBL
URIBL_BOFHLAND
URIBL_SWINOG
URIBL_JMF_BL
URIBL_MAILPOLICE
===========================
Hosted on my RBLDNSD server
===========================
URIBL_SEM_F
URIBL_SEMRED
But as I've said, these are just 'my' results, the have no basis in
reality to anyone elses results.
Bill
Other related posts:
