[sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- From: "Jack Jones" <spicastar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 21:55:30 -0700
What's orthogonal?
jj
Paul or anyone; What's E?
aj
Paul Dickson wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2002 18:13:14 -0700, Paul Dickson wrote:
>
> > The approved changes to the constitution:
> >
> > A. Spending more than $200, except in unforeseen circumstances with
> > majority approval by the board.
>
> I don't like this change. It's not orthogonal. If we want the limit, it
> should be added as E.
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- From: Paul Dickson
- References:
- [sac-board] Constitution Changes
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- From: AJ Crayon
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Constitution Changes
- » [sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- » [sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- » [sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- » [sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- » [sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- » [sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- » [sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- [sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Constitution Changes
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: Constitution Changes
- From: AJ Crayon