> On May 23, 2008, at 4:07 PM, Thor Legvold wrote: > >> Aaron, what's the difference between 400TX and Tri-X? > > Aargh, I meant that I prefer TMY 400, or whatever code name Kodak is > using for it nowadays. You know, the 400-speed T-max tabular grain > film. Sorry for the confusion. > > -Aaron > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list My first experiences of Xtol was with Tri X. 1:2. A whole brick I shot in May 1999 the entire Lewis and Clark route I shot with my new for me Leicas. About a 20 roll brick. But I quickly got into 1:3 and tab grain films and betwixt the two of them I came out better by 100%. Xtol really brings out the sharpness of tri X but for me I begged for an experience with the tab grain films. And that worked out just as I intuited. At 1:3 with tab grain 400 films you show somebody your print and have them guess what film you shot and they'll guess 100 every time. So in effect you've moved up a notch. I ended up doing most of my street work in the early 2000's with Neopan 1600. Which looked better than Tri X in D67 1:1 or 1:2 or any other developer I'd use with it including Beutlers or Rodinal. In the previous decades. Or Rabinol. My home brew. .................... Mark William Rabiner --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list