thanks, richard. On 7/27/10, Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Burck" <chris.burck@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 3:30 PM > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: XTOL Mix-It-Yourself Formula > > >> richard, can you post that reply again? i'm reasonably >> sure i >> deciphering it correctly, but. . . . >> > Marc said that both diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid > pentasodium salt and > 4-hydroxymethyl-4-methyl-1-phenyl-3-pyrazolidinone were > exotic and hard to find. Both are available but the first, > DPTA Na4 is available only in large quantities and at too > high a price. The second is Kodak Dimezone-S a variety of > phenidone. Its available in small quantity from > Photographer's Formulary at reasonabl prices. I think the > DPTA is present mainly to control dissolved iron in the > water but may have other purposes. If the water is > reasonably pure it may not be necessary. The formula in the > patent is intended for commmerical packaging and must be > capable of being mixed successfully in water containing a > wide variety of impurities so it contains substances to deal > with those impurities that may not be necessary where they > are absent from the water. > Ryuji Suzuki who has worked out a number of very good > developers has one with similar properties to Xtol but is > more stable. I am not sure of the state of his manufacturing > at the moment. He wrote that he had a falling out with some > partners who wanted to lower the quality of the products. I > think he is making the stuff under a different name now. In > any case Kodak seems to have overcome the problems with > Xtol. > BTW, Marc stated that it was not a favorite of > commercial labs. That may be but in fact it is a self > replenishing developer with high capacity and eminently > suitable for continuous machines. Self-replenishing means > that the developer itself is used as the replenisher. The > activity is kept uniform by draining off and replacing a > certain volume of developer on a continuing basis. Of course > accurate control must include sensitometric tests but for a > home lab where more volume is done than is economical using > diluted developer on a one-shot bases, reasonably constant > performance can be gotten by simple a replenishment > technique. > > -- > Richard Knoppow > Los Angeles, CA, USA > dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list