Thank you David for explaining that. Now the question is, does anyone actually own one of these 250 T cameras? Hey Todd, how about you? I know you have some rare models. Peter K=20 On 4/22/05, David Seifert <dseifert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > OK, let me state categorically, that I never intended to say or imply > that there was a T that would take 220 film. There is no such beast! I > did state that Prochnow reports the existence of 250 special order T > cameras that produce 24 24x36 images on 120 film with a special mask > kit. These cameras produced 12 6x6 images on 120 film when the mask set > was not installed. Therefore, there are/were 250 T cameras with 12/24 > frame counters. THEY DID NOT TAKE 220 FILM! >=20 > All other T cameras are equipped with 12/16 frame counters. The later > ones are also capable of having the Rolleikin 2 installed. >=20 > Is this unambiguous now? >=20 > David >=20 >=20 > Peter K. wrote: >=20 > >I have the T with the mask. I can do 12 exposures of 6x6cm without > >mask, and 16 exposures of 6x4.5cm with the mask. > >WHen you insert the mask, it pushes a small metal rod of sorts that > >move the counter from 12 to 16. I also have a Rolleikin for the T, and > >when I use this the only thing I need do is make sure the pressure > >plate on the back is set to 36mmx 24mm. > > > >I do not doubt the claim that somewhere in existence is a custom T > >that is capable of 24 exposures, but according to Prochnow himself Ts > >NEVER had 220 capability. > >So this must have either been an error or it was a special run that > >was never sold. > > > >Peter K=3D20 > > > >On 4/22/05, David Seifert <dseifert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >>Jim, > >>=3D20 > >>My reference was only to the first model (PR184 and PR184/1). The late= r > >>models (beginning with S/N T2,157,000 - July 1961) are, indeed equipped > >>for the Rolleikin 2. According to Prochnow, these cameras are equipped > >>to do the 12/16 trick as well and have the option of either 4x4 > >>(Superslide) or 4x5.5 masks. The pressure plate would remain in the 6x= 6 > >>position and insertion of the film mask would set the film counter and > >>transport to 4cm frame height (and thus 16 frames per roll). > >>=3D20 > >>David > >>=3D20 > >>Jim Somberg wrote: > >>=3D20 > >> > >> > >>>According to my two Rollei T's, the film pressure plate is settable to= e=3D > >>> > >>> > >ither 6X6 cm or 24X36MM, the latter with a Rolleikin, of course. > > > > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: David Seifert > >>> To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 6:34 PM > >>> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: "There is a 220 Rollei T" > >>> > >>> Ardeshir Mehta wrote: > >>> > >>> >On Friday, April 22, 2005, at 07:02 PM, David Seifert wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >>Marc, > >>> >> > >>> >>You were only partially in error. The units in question were equipp= e=3D > >>> > >>> > >d > > > > > >>> >>with a 24 frame counter. The camera still used 120 film but produce= d > >>> >>24 smaller (24x36?) on the film via a masking system. We went throu= g=3D > >>> > >>> > >h > > > > > >>> >>this last year in more detail than anyone cares to recall. > >>> >> > >>> >>Best Regards, > >>> >>David > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> >Oh? This is interesting! Are you sure the prints were as small as 24= x=3D > >>> > >>> > >36 > > > > > >>> >mm? Could they have been 30x60 mm? > >>> > > >>> >A. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Ardeshir, > >>> > >>> Just for you, I look this up again. According to Prochnow in Rollei > >>> Report 2 page 409 there were 250 units of this type built in June 196= 1=3D > >>> > >>> > >. > > > > > >>> He notes that these were "Direktverkauf, nicht gelistet", direct sale= , > >>> no price listed. I interpret that to mean that these were a custom > >>> order batch. The customer is not mentioned. They used 120 film and > >>> produced either 12 6x6 images per roll or 24 24x36 images per roll us= i=3D > >>> > >>> > >ng > > > > > >>> the special mask kit. Thus, they had a 12/24 frame counter. > >>> > >>> For the record, the standard model of that run (56,000 units) came wi= t=3D > >>> > >>> > >h > > > > > >>> a 12/16 frame counter equipped to do 12 or 16 exposures per 120 roll. > >>> The mask kit produced 16 4.5x5 images. > >>> > >>> Thus spake Prochnow! > >>> > >>> David > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>=3D20 > >>=3D20 > >> > >> > > > > > >--=3D20 > >Peter K > >=3DD3=3DBF=3DD5=3DAC > > > > > > > > >=20 >=20 --=20 Peter K =D3=BF=D5=AC