My guess is that it's an HP Indigo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigo_Digital_Press I've seen similar output from a local press. It looks like color laser, but smoother, (to me). I don't know what LULU does. E. -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx> > Elias - > > Do you or anyone on the list know about the technology used by Lulu > and Blurb to print? It seems to be the consensus that Blurb seems to > handle fine images better, and I wonder (if it is true!) why that > might be... > > > Eric Goldstein > > -- > > On 5/9/08, ERoustom <eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Digital output has its limitations, especially since not all the images > > could be output, adjusted for the output device and then output again (test > > strip, working print, etc.). Some images, either through luck or experience, > > seem perfect for the process. Just think what a radical idea it is to > > publish something so quickly, and without the constraints of traditional > > publishing over-head costs. What would Gutenberg, Faust and Schoefer think! > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list