[rollei_list] Re: Print Exchange(what am I looking at?)

  • From: eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 17:59:23 +0000

Hahnemühle. We use their Copper Plate paper to letterpress on. Best paper I've 
ever used - though it sluffs off fibers like mad as it runs through the press, 
and has been responsible for several sinus aches.

That Epson is a $15,000 machine. Cutting edge stuff. How do the prints look?

E.



 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: <dlp4777@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I am hole up today in a rental color lab in Portland and they make digital 
> art 
> prints and they are in the middle of a huge print job(we are talking 100K) 
> making 40x60 black and white prints from scanned 4x5 TXP negs.  The printer 
> they 
> are using is an Epson 11880 and they are printing with Epson Ultra Chrome ink 
> on 
> Hamamuel(SP?) photo rag.  How close is this to state of the art in digital 
> printing quality?
> Dennis
> 
> 
> Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
> > > I don't think we need to agonize over this. Let each medium speak for
> > > itself and its practitioner. The common element will be the Rollei
> > > negative, and I promise a very attractive enclosure.
> > > 
> > > As for a test of competence, getting this exchange going seems very
> > > complicated. How did Daniel make putting his book together seem so easy?
> > > 
> > > Elias
> > > 
> > I think develop, stop, fix, wash is pretty darned easy.
> > Darkroom printing is easy.
> > Its real easy to get an image.
> > Its not so easy to get an image which looks like the stuff that we see on
> > gallery walls with the rich blacks and silvery tones and or glow. But people
> > do luck out if they put enough time and paper in.
> > I think its easier to luck out when making an inkjet print and achieving a
> > high quality result.
> > 
> > The good thing about prints are they are IN HAND results.
> > You can talk about numbers and history and theory all you want but with IN
> > HAND RESULTS that you are looking that with ones eyeballs that is the common
> > denominator and it ain't low.
> > One can flip though ones stack of prints and say poo to the platinum from
> > Dennis, or "icky!" from the inkjet from yours truly if that's your reaction.
> > You'll react before you know what is is and how it was done and who did it.
> > 
> > The proof is in the pudding and the print is the pudding.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ....................
> > Mark William Rabiner
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ---
> > Rollei List
> > 
> > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
> > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> > 
> > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
> > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> > 
> > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> 
> ---
> Rollei List
> 
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> 
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> 
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> 

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: