I think the 40mm lens might be larger and heavier than the 120/2 lens if that is true the front standard should support the lens. I have used the camera unsupported on my 500mm and 750mm telephotos with out a problem. Jonathan -----Original Message----- From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jerry Lehrer Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:47 PM To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Planar 120/2 for the SL66 Asmo and other RUGers This appears to be overpriced, doncha think? Prochnow has made no mention of it, but I am certain that our Argy friend will refute this. He has had more direct correspondence with Prochnow before his passing. D'ya think that the front standard of the SL66 could take the weight? Jerry Lehrer On 12/29/2010 1:52 PM, asmo.saarikoski@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hello, > > Those of us who have been curious about the ontological status of this > mythical beast might want to check item 160499618827 on > you-know-where. There is even a clearly legible serial number for Marc. > > Cheers, > Asmo > --- > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list