On Thursday, April 21, 2005, at 12:37 PM, Jerry Lehrer wrote: > David, > > His math is just as f&^%$ed up as his other thinking! :-) > > Jerry Get over it, Jerry ... it was merely a slight error, and was later addressed. A. +++++ > David Seifert wrote: > >> Double Ummm.... >> >> 30,000 gallons of jet fuel to go 3,000 nm is 10 gallons per mile, not >> 10 miles per gallon! >> David >> >> David Seifert wrote: >> >>> Ummmm, how does this work out when the trip between LHR and JFK is >>> only 3,000 NM? A bit thirstier I'll bet! >>> >>> Cute Great Circle Route calculator here -> http://gc.kls2.com/ >>> >>> David >>> >>> Ardeshir Mehta wrote: >>> >>>> On Wednesday, April 20, 2005, at 10:26 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> You guys are spoilt - I pay roughly the equivalent of US$4 per >>>>> gallon for regular... >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> Jayanand Govindaraj >>>>> Chennai, India >>>> >>>> Quite right, Jayanand. We can only start complaining when gasoline >>>> costs over US$10 (or its equivalent) per US gallon. >>>> >>>> Did you know that each of the passengers on the Concorde used to >>>> fly at TWICE the speed of sound 6,000 nautical miles over the >>>> Atlantic for less than 300 US gallons of jet fuel, costing NO MORE >>>> THAN US$500 at the time, and often much less? This was with the >>>> "thirstiest" airliner every to fly. Over 20 miles to the gallon! >>>> (Do the math: the Concorde carried less than 30,000 gallons of fuel >>>> in its tanks, and 100 passengers - and was never refuelled in >>>> mid-air.) >>>> >>>> The passengers paid as much as US$15,000 per ticket, and only $500 >>>> for that went towards paying for the fuel. (The rest was for the >>>> champagne, caviar, foie-gras and truffles on the 3-hour flight, >>>> surely. Yeah, right.) >>>> >>>> Ardeshir <http://homepage.mac.com/ardeshir>