Carlos, I very much liked your photos. Our own Southern mountains, the Appalachians, are not even one-quarter the height of your Andes. They are "respectable," as you say, only by their age, and the plants and wildlife they shelter, and the people who inhabit them. I recently posted a portrait I made of Melanie's grandmother, with some words that tried to capture an aspect of Appalachian life that has gone missing among us flatlanders. http://www.flickr.com/photos/sandersnyc/5719966773/ Thanks for sharing yours -- much appreciated, much enjoyed. Sent from my iPad On May 21, 2011, at 1:07 AM, FreeLists Mailing List Manager <ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 07:37:56 -0300 > Subject: [rollei_list] More southern mountains with Rollei > From: CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx> > > While the highest Andes range and Americas peak is placed in the > argentinean Province of Mendoza (Aconcagua, 6962m; 22.841 ft), a few > hundreds of kilometers to the south, at the Patagonia, the Andes range > altitude becomes lower significantly but they are still respectable > mountains, these other two photographs were taken there. I visited the > zone twice, the first time was a High School graduation travel, I > can't find the photographs I took with the Rolleiflex 2.8C and the > slides with a Petri FT SLR Japanese camera. The photographs I'm > uploading to Flickr are from my second travel, almost 20 years after > the first one, a long travel by car (2600km to go and same distance to > return), photographs were taken with a Rollei SL 35 and Rolleinar > (Mamiya) 2/50 lens: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/5729398509/in/photostream > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/itarfoto/5729947884/in/photostream > > Carlos