[rollei_list] Re: Ilford "sheet film, custom & specialist film manufacture" 2013

  • From: Hauke Fath <hauke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 08:55:13 +0200

At 16:43 Uhr -0400 15.5.2013, Marc James Small wrote:
> >For all I know, the last manufacturer of 127 spindles was EFKE/Fotokemika,
> >and those spindles are too big for the Rolleiflex 4x4. You have to grind
> >the spindle sides down a few tenths of a millimeter (at least, IIRC), so
> >you might as well keep them after all the work.  ;)
>
>Hmm.  I've been shooting EFKE 127 in my Baby Grey
>for at least a quarter of a century and I've
>never had any problems with the spindles being
>too large for the film chambers.  Your Mileage May Vary, I guess.

Not meaning to contest your (good, fortunately) experience... but I have a
list of links to experiences similar to mine. Whether Fotokemika changed
(spool|spindle) tolerances at some point, I do not know; but a packet of
their 127 film I bought a few years ago definitely exhibits the problem.
They are still tucked away in boxes after a move last year, so I cannot
quickly take a measurement, but I remember having to file off half a
millimeter from the flanges.

In 2009, I asked the late Jürgen Kuschnick whether anything could be done
constructively about the "Grey Baby" film roll bay size, and he said no. He
wasn't very fond of working on it, either.

hauke


--
"It's never straight up and down"     (DEVO)


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: