On Saturday, March 5, 2005, at 01:12 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote: > Platinum prints do not have to be large. Even prints from Rollei > negatives will have the special quality of this type of printing. Yes, of course. But a large print has a totally different VISUAL impact compared to a small print from the same negative. Some prints are best viewed small, but mine are just the opposite. To give an example: I recently had two of my 4x5 (Speed Graphic) Velvia 50 slides of a nearby lake, which I had taken in the fall, stitched together to make a panorama, and had the resulting picture printed professionally by inkjet on a 20 x 48 inch sheet. It's absolutely GORGEOUS, and compares well to any photos taken by Makal Karsh (Yusuf Karsh's brother, whose landscape photos put Ottawa on the map). I intend to get my panorama framed some time in a double-matted 30 x 60 inch frame - at a cost of CAN.$600 or so (gasp)! - and I shall hang it above the couch in my TV room, a perfect place for it. This picture would not have NEARLY the same impact if it were merely 4 x 9.5 inches in size, which is the approximate size of the slides when stitched together, or even 10 x 24 inches. > The main drawback of Platinum/Paladium printing is the cost of the > metal. Pladium used to be cheaper but its now about the same as > Platinum. Yes, I know. > There are other alternative methods which are much cheaper and not too > difficult. Yes, the best of them being Piezography, which is comparatively cheap if one does it oneself on a dedicated printer with the Cone inks. But even then, I can't possibly afford a Piezography printer which can print on sheets 22 x 30 inches! But West Coast Imaging does Piezography at a decent cost (I only intend to get one or two, or at most three, 16x20 Piezography prints made in a year, which I can definitely afford). > Dick Sullivan is an old friend. Before he moved to Santa Fe he lived > nearby and I saw him all the time. B&S are very good folks and will > help with learning any of the processes they sell material for. Yes, I gather that from their very nice and friendly web site! > A shameless plug if there ever was one. Heh-heh! But you know, I WOULD like to get a Hobo (see <http://www.bostick-sullivan.com/Hobo/technical.htm>) eventually. What a fantastic concept! A hand-held 8x10 camera! The cost of a Hobo at present (with a suitable lens) is too much for me right now, but one day I shall definitely get one, with a Nikkor SW 120mm lens. Cheers, Ardeshir <http://homepage.mac.com/ardeshir/>