I shot lots of Plus-X roll film. It had a very nice gradient. Like with any black and white film you have to tailor your developement to your printing system - enlarger (illumination), lens, paper and paper developer. Plus-X had a very nice shoulder and I had some adjusting to do when the relatively shoulderless T-Max 100 came in. I always felt that Plus-X was a little more grainy than a 125 speed film of that era should have been, even in low grain developers like Microdol. And in the low grain developers it tended to get even a little flat. Comparativly, Tri-X 400 was a little short on gray scale (can't recall about the Tri-X 320) and Pan-X, while very fine grained, could get contrasty very quickly in slightly errant developing. Tim Ellestad ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 6:00 PM Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Black and white film question > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 3:06 PM > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Black and white film question > > > > (snipped) > > > >> Plus-X roll film seems to have gotten lost in the > >> shuffle. Its a very good film but no one seems to use it. > >> > >> --- > >> Richard Knoppow > >> Los Angeles, CA, USA > >> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > I find it too contrasty and difficult to print. Tri-X and > > Delta are easier > > for me to print and to control contrast through > > exposure/development. Then > > again, I am not the world's best printer... > > > > > > Eric Goldstein > > > > I am curious about this. What sort of images do you get > with Plus-X. Can you describe how the excessive contrast > affects the tone reproduction on the print? > --- > Richard Knoppow > Los Angeles, CA, USA > dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > Richard Knoppow > Los Angeles, CA, USA > dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >