Dirk, I also would a true classic for a "Special Edition" model like the 2.8 F or even the late T. Why does "Special Edition" always have to mean unaffordable? A metered Rolleiflex T Special Edition with a less limited stock of 1000 or even 5000 would certainly prompt me to upgrade from my 3.5 E. Not sure about a digital sensor - maybe only if it could simply be exchanged for the existing back of an FX / FW. The film chambers could hold the rechargeable units.... Jan On May 25, 2011, at 1:07 AM, FreeLists Mailing List Manager wrote: > From: <Dirk-Roger.Schmitt@xxxxxx> > Subject: [rollei_list] AW: 2.8F 50th anniversary FX special edition > Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:07:50 +0000 > Hu Hu, limited stock of 88 items......... > Very promising!!!! I would prefer a 2,8 F with all mechanics and a full size > digital sensor. > Keep the optical viewfinder and integrate a digital screen on the back. > Why the hell, nobody is able to produce something like that? > Dirk