[roc-chat] Re: Stability: Time to Use the Mojo
- From: Richard Dierking <redierking@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:28:21 +0000
Interesting added character on the previous messages? The problem with adding
fins to the strap-ons is that it could cause roll strain on the attachment
points. Also, I didn't test this design on my Delta X and I don't want to
divert too much from what I know already works with securing the strap-ons. I
want to get the strap-on booster method tested because I'm planning something
much larger in the future. Richard From: kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC:
Subject: [roc-chat] Re: Stability: Time to Use the Mojo
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:23:59 -0700
Why not have the fins on the strap on boosters?
Solves many problems that way....
Mike
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [roc-chat] Re: Stability: Time to Use the Mojo
> From: Richard Dierking <redierking@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, August 11, 2011 8:36 am
> To: <roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Not at all; very good question. I considered this. I wanted to keep the
> fin number down to a minimum because the strap-ons are ejected (with pyro
> bolts) and I don't want them hitting the fins.  The first six strap-ons
> that are ejected are on opposite sides of each fin.  This will leave the
> last three airstarted strap-ons centered between the three fins and shouldÂ
> help to provide fin area for the correcting force during the last part of
> powered flight.
> Â
> RichardÂ
> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:01:58 -0700
> Subject: [roc-chat] Re: Stability: Time to Use the Mojo
> From: rubr.duky@xxxxxxxxx
> To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Silly question... Why not six?
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 20:46, Richard Dierking <redierking@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
Other related posts:
