I'm going to try to address many of the things people said including their questions directly to me. And, don't mind elaborating on any particular point if you wish. This is a complicated matter. Many hobby stores sell model rockets but don't help people with ways to launch them. Wow, is that true! Recently, I suggested that TRA develop a brochure like NAR's to try to reach some of these potential rocket enthusiasts. I'm also working on a new ROC flyer for Board review and plan to spend some time at hobby stores in Temecula and Murrieta helping people that are interested in rocketry. Many of us discovered rocketry at hobby stores and if I have some success I suggest other people try this. People that go to hobby stores are excellent candidates for our club. I think our club's price structure for youth groups needs serious revision. Often income from youth groups isn't enough to cover the portable toilets they use. Yes, I think we should manage youth groups. I'm not suggesting eliminating youth groups or low power, just achieving a balance between the available human and equipment resources we have and the number of people that are looking for a service. We are a club first and must consider the desires of the people in the club before commitment to others. This isn't work; everyone should have free time at launches and having to work long shifts, begging for relief then having to walk away from a position, or continually hearing that the range is going to be shutdown if someone doesn't fill a position is irritating. We must balance the number of and size of large groups with the available help to safely run the launch and have a good time doing it. Inadequate help is not safe at a rocket launch. I've heard many different proposals on how to reduce the size of lines or spit the range or whatever at launches but in the end you still have three people to run it. About kids from schools and whether Scouts are less important: For a rocket club with limited resources if it's between a group specifically doing a rocket project or a group of kids just doing another activity, the rocket group is more important. All youth groups should have at least one person that knows the expectations of our club and is willing to help running the launch. Why couldn't CAP run a launch? Instead of just showing kids how we do it, why not provide them with the experience? Learning about launch equipment and running the range is a very important part of rocketry. There's nothing to my knowledge in the by-laws prohibiting loaning launch equipment. Some TARC groups have their own launch equipment and others that are just starting are not well equipped. TARC teams need more help in California. I'm only volunteering myself and if others in our club want to help we should get together. Finally, ROCtober. Some of you knew this was coming. ;-) I've now heard many people suggest it's just going to die. Wow, this seems harsh, but for example, at the last one it would be very easy for me to list the people that signed up for range duty on Saturday morning. Yup. This year it sounds like there will even be less, which is really bad. So, I think it's time to say it was great and did a lot of good. Some people, like Payton and Mike Kramer, worked very hard at it and often compensated for the help they needed but it wasn't there. I realize that there's a fundamental difference in opinion over quantity verses quality when it comes to running a launch and maybe even a club. Some people want the most people to have the experience. I see their point and understand based on their own experience. However, for me, it's the quality of the experience. I would rather have more time with 20 kids than have to rush with 100. From my experience it's not only less stressful for everyone, but more substantial. Now, I would like other people to say they know what I mean. If the Board (with membership support) said, lets go out with ROCtober on a good note, support it well, maybe even celebrate a bit, and go to managing youth groups on a monthly basis, I bet that many people would chip in one more time for the Gipper. Mike, have you ever been called the Gipper? Richard Dierking