On 7/3/05, Stefan Schmiedl <s@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Charles Childers (30.06. 19:06): > > > * Better Documentation (including a complete glossary of words and a > > tutorial) > > And what a splendid piece of work the Retroforth Book is. > Congratulations! > > I've browsed through it this afternoon and found it a delightful read. > > One suggestion: The descriptions of the words mfind and >number > each contain a lot of "return" values. Instead of "returning" > the success of the operation, it would be better to "set the conditional > flag". Referring to ?if in the explanation would be an act of kindness, > too. > > And I just can't understand the first sentence of the "Forth Syntax" > section of the tutorial. What does > "Most of the Forth language has a very simple syntax of any computer > language." > mean? Perhaps something like: > "The programming language Forth has the simplest syntax." > "Forth syntax is simpler than the syntax of other computer languages." > "Most of Forth's syntax is simpler than other languages' syntax." > > I'm looking forward to the end of my current projects, when I can get > to work with Retroforth again. > > s. > > -- > Stefan Schmiedl > +-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+ > |Approximity GmbH | EDV-Beratung Schmiedl | > |http://www.approximity.com | Am Bräuweiher 4, 93499 Zandt, Germany | > |mailto:stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Tel. (09944) 3068-98, Fax -97 | > +-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+ > > Thanks Stefan! I'm working on an update to the glossary, I'll be sure to explain the setting of the conditional flag in find, mfind, and >number. I'll also correct that sentence in the tutorial. This week for me is kind of busy, but I'll try to get an updated Handbook online by the weekend. -- Charles R. Childers http://www.retroforth.org