Over the last month, I've been reviewing copyright law in the USA. It seems to be very complex in some cases, especially with regards to the public domain. The ultimate conclusion I came to was that (sadly), authors and developers can't explicitly place their work into the public domain, at least in the USA. Of course, I am not a lawyer, but I can't afford to hire one either. For this reason, I've begun to work on a statement that sort of covers this, while still providing for free, unrestricted use and modification. The text is drawn from the MIT/X11 License: The authors of this software and/or documentation (the "Software") would like to give their work to the public domain. In the event that your country does not recognize this as valid, they also grant permission, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this Software to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. Any thoughts or comments concerning this would be appreciated. My intent is to make it clear that you may use, modify, and redistribute Retro without any restrictions, even if your country does not recognize the ability of an author to give up their copyright protections. -- Charles R. Childers http://www.retroforth.org