[realmusicians] Re: window-eyes behaving

  • From: Indigo <33indigo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: realmusicians@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 02:02:32 -0500

For me, WE 7.2 on Windows 7 32 bits was much smoother than any version of 7.5 on Win 7 64. With all this tweaking, I'm just now getting nearly the same steadiness from 7.5.1 on Windows 7 64.

That's why I was so horrified to lose ground from 7.5.2.
You already know what I think, why are you using Winize version 7 anything on XP?
Isn't that a little bit like trying to mate a horse with a cow?
WE 6.1 was The Rock Of Gibraltar for XP, written for it.
I somehow missed out on 6.2, could be better, but I don't know how
Is the updater for 6.2 still around anywhere?
Indigo L




On 11/23/2011 11:58 PM, Chris Belle wrote:
Well, I just don't know wha to think.

since I ghosted back and put we 7.2 refreshed version on my system, my
screen-reader is my friend again.

all sorts of little things, like list views not becomming unfocused,
windows not disappearing, namely sonar, and snappy response.

There's still the maddening thing about window-eyes loosing typed
characters if you go too fast in emails and such,
that's been around forever, but over all, atleast on my hardware, we 7.2
refresh seems to be the sweet spot.

Now I wonder if somehow the new ui stuff is messing up performance in xp
since that's what I'm using?
Haven't tried we in w7 yet,
but in a discussion with a friend, it was brought out that the ui stuff
can sometimes cause problems with non ui stuff, is this true?

Could it be that the older we is just a better match for the older os,
maybe the advancing technology broke something for the old stuff
inadvertently.

What do the programmer types say?




For all your audio production needs and technology training, visit us at

www.affordablestudioservices.com
or contact
Chris Belle
cb1963@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
or
Stephie Belle
stephieb1961@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
for customized web design



Other related posts: