Thanks Ryuji. I'll try it, and do some hypo residual tests. Does 300ppm of sodium bicarbonate equal 300mg/Litre, or am I missing something in the calculation? John ============================= At 11:04 AM 2/03/2005, you wrote: >From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: [pure-silver] Re: washing film with deminarilised water >Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:28:21 -0800 > > > As far as I can tell from the paper published by Kodak on > > sulfite wash aid (I'll find the citation) the nature of the > > water used after treatment is of little importance. The > > sulfite aid also allows the use of colder water for washing. > >Which paper? Crabtree, King and Henn? > > > It also contains some EDTA tetra sodium salt and some sodium citrate > > probably to prevent deposits of minerals from the water or to > > prevent a sludge from forming where the wash aid is reused. > >That too but they also operate as antioxidants to preserve the useful >life of the bath. > > > Sulfite has a specific effect as an ion exchange agent in > > addition to its alkaline pH. It is this ion exchange > > property which makes it far more effective than treatments > > in alkaline salts like carbonates. > >You are mixing two issues here. John is talking about deliberate >incorporation of impurities in wash water, not wash aid bath. For >example Green (1975) found faster washing with tap water than with >pure water. According to another publication by Green and Levenson >(1974), they had tap water from Colne Valley at Research Division in >Harrow. For cations, as CaCO3 equivalents, calcium was 200ppm, >magnesium 24ppm, sodium 9.3ppm, potassium 2.8ppm. For anions, as >sodium salt equivalents, chloride 76ppm, sulfate 56ppm, carbonate >56ppm and nitrate 23ppm. The pH was 7.4. I would think that 300ppm of >sodium bicarbonate added to pure water would give comparable washing >and swelling profile to their tap water. > >However, I am not sure if this is advantageous after washing aid >treatment. I am also not sure if higher dose of bicarbonate would >further improve washing property. In another paper by Green and >Levenson (1970) they tested dose-dependent washing profile with acid >fixers, one hardening and one non-hardening. In that study, they used >up to 0.16g/L of bicarbonate, wich was superior to 0.016g/L in case of >hardening fixer. But 0.016g/L was fast enough and they didn't test >0.16g/L for nonhardening fixer. > >Green, A. and Levenson, G.I.P. 1974. Emulsion swelling during >washing, etc. J. Photogr. Sci., 22, 194-8. > >Green, A. 1975. Some aspects of fixation and washing. >Photogr. Sci. Engr., 19, 124-9. > >-- >Ryuji Suzuki >"Keep a good head and always carry a light camera." >============================================================================================================= >To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your >account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you >subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.